Loading...
A comparison of two methods in acquiring stimulus : Response curves with transcranial magnetic stimulation
Pearce, Alan Clark, Ross Kidgell, Dawson
Pearce, Alan
Clark, Ross
Kidgell, Dawson
Abstract
Background The stimulus–response (S–R) curve is a well accepted constituent in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies. However, it has been suggested that parameters of the S–R curve differ when stimuli are provided in a “ramped” (measured steps from low to high intensity), or “random” fashion. Hypothesis We hypothesized that there would be no difference in the parameters of the S–R curve between either methodologies. Methods Using a randomised cross-over design, 10 healthy participants (29.6 ± 6.4 yrs, 3 f) completed “ramped” or “random” curves in biceps brachii (BB) and first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscles of both limbs. Curves were compared using mixed-factor ANOVA and correlated between limbs and methodologies. Results No differences (P > 0.05) and high correlations (range 0.71–0.97; P < 0.001) were observed in BB and FDI data between curves. Conclusions This study demonstrated that either methodology provides similar parameters of the S–R curve in healthy participants.
Keywords
Transcranial magnetic stimulation, Stimulus–response curve, Hand, Arm
Date
2013
Type
Journal article
Journal
Brain Stimulation: basic, translational and clinical research in neuromodulation
Book
Volume
Issue
Page Range
306-309
Article Number
ACU Department
Collections
Relation URI
Source URL
Event URL
Open Access Status
License
File Access
Controlled