"His blood be on us and on our children!” Matthean irony and the ratification of covenant through blood

Hili, Jonathan

Item

"His blood be on us and on our children!” Matthean irony and the ratification of covenant through blood

Hili, Jonathan

Citations

Google Scholar:

Lookup

Altmetric:

Author

Hili, Jonathan

Abstract

This thesis addresses the interpretive problem of Matt 27:25: And all the people answered, “His blood be on us and on our children!” Historically, the verse has been understood as condemning all Israel and so associated with anti-Judaism, anti-Semitism and sometimes justifying Jewish persecution. While recent scholarship attempts to distance the verse’s meaning from a tradition of “national curse” or “blood guilt” by instead directing the author’s intention in judgement upon Jerusalem, its cultic system and/or the Matthean community’s ideological opponents, such interpretations fail to do justice to the narrative. This is primarily due to the use of language in Matt 27:25 (πᾶς ὁ λαὸς, “all the people”), which seems to intentionally signify “Israel”. The interpretation favoured by this thesis is one grounded in an ironic, particularly double-entendre, reading of the text. Its is argued that Matt 27:25 is part of the Gospel’s recapitulation of the Mosaic covenant at Sinai, signalled at the Last Supper and fulfilling Jesus’ function in the narrative as a second Moses. The people’s cry is an anticipated response that seals the compact (the sacrificial blood is upon them and their children); however, remaining within Christ’s reformed covenant requires obeying his commandments (to find blessing) or else fall under judgement.