Loading...
The marriage of psychology and law : Testamentary capacity
Zuscak, Simon Coyle, Ian Keyzer, Patrick Machin, M. Anthony
Zuscak, Simon
Coyle, Ian
Keyzer, Patrick
Machin, M. Anthony
Citations
Altmetric:
Abstract
Banks v. Goodfellow [1870. LR 5 QB 549 (Eng.)] is almost 150 years old, yet still stands as authority for the principle that unsoundness of the mind will not rebut testamentary capacity where it does not affect the will itself. Readers of this journal would know that psychology has advanced greatly during this sesquicentenary, and yet the law relating to testamentary capacity has remained relatively stagnant. We review the present laws relating to decision-making for adults with impaired capacity, particularly in Queensland, and also review various models of gauging decision-making capacity in other jurisdictions. We argue that qualified experts should be enlisted to make determinations about testamentary capacity when questions of capacity arise. We also argue the case for the development of scientifically validated protocols to assess decision-making capacity in the testamentary context.
Keywords
assessment protocol, cognitive testing, dementia, expert evidence, regulated decision-making, testamentary capacity
Date
2019
Type
Journal article
Journal
Psychiatry, Psychology and Law
Book
Volume
26
Issue
4
Page Range
614-643
Article Number
ACU Department
Thomas More Law School
Faculty of Law and Business
Faculty of Law and Business
Collections
Relation URI
DOI
Source URL
Event URL
Open Access Status
License
All rights reserved
File Access
Controlled