Thumbnail Image
Item

Prioritizing a research agenda on built environments and physical activity : a twin panel Delphi consensus process with researchers and knowledge users

Prince, Stephanie A.
; 
Lang, Justin J
; 
de Groh, Margaret
; 
Badland, Hannah
; 
Barnett, Anthony
; 
Littlejohns, Lori Baugh
; 
Brandon, Nicholas C.
; 
Butler, Gregory P.
; 
Casu, Géna
; 
Cerin, Ester
... show 5 more
Citations
Google Scholar:
Lookup
Altmetric:
Author
Prince, Stephanie A.
Lang, Justin J
de Groh, Margaret
Badland, Hannah
Barnett, Anthony
Littlejohns, Lori Baugh
Brandon, Nicholas C.
Butler, Gregory P.
Casu, Géna
Cerin, Ester
Colley, Rachel C.
de Lannoy, Louise
Demchenko, Iryna
Ellingwood, Holly N.
et. al.
Abstract
Background The growth of urban dwelling populations globally has led to rapid increases of research and policy initiatives addressing associations between the built environment and physical activity (PA). Given this rapid proliferation, it is important to identify priority areas and research questions for moving the field forward. The objective of this study was to identify and compare research priorities on the built environment and PA among researchers and knowledge users (e.g., policy makers, practitioners). Methods Between September 2022 and April 2023, a three-round, modified Delphi survey was conducted among two independent panels of international researchers (n = 38) and knowledge users (n = 23) to identify similarities and differences in perceived research priorities on the built environment and PA and generate twin ‘top 10’ lists of the most important research needs. Results From a broad range of self-identified issues, both panels ranked in common the most pressing research priorities including stronger study designs such as natural experiments, research that examines inequalities and inequities, establishing the cost effectiveness of interventions, safety and injuries related to engagement in active transportation (AT), and considerations for climate change and climate adaptation. Additional priorities identified by researchers included: implementation science, research that incorporates Indigenous perspectives, land-use policies, built environments that support active aging, and participatory research. Additional priorities identified by knowledge users included: built environments and PA among people living with disabilities and a need for national data on trip chaining, multi-modal travel, and non-work or school-related AT. Conclusions Five common research priorities between the two groups emerged, including (1) to better understand causality, (2) interactions with the natural environment, (3) economic evaluations, (4) social disparities, and (5) preventable AT-related injuries. The findings may help set directions for future research, interdisciplinary and intersectoral collaborations, and funding opportunities.
Keywords
built environment, physical activity, Delphi, knowledge gaps, knowledge translation
Date
2023
Type
Journal article
Journal
Book
Volume
20
Issue
1
Page Range
1-16
Article Number
ACU Department
Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research
Faculty of Health Sciences
Collections
Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research
Show all metadata
Files
Thumbnail Image
SM7_Barnett_2023_Prioritizing_a_research_agenda_on_built.pdf
Adobe PDF, 142.15 KB
CC BY 4.0
SM5_Barnett_2023_Prioritizing_a_research_agenda_on_built.pdf
Adobe PDF, 187.37 KB
CC BY 4.0
OA_Barnett_2023_Prioritizing_a_research_agenda_on_built.pdf
Adobe PDF, 2.51 MB
CC BY 4.0
SM1_Barnett_2023_Prioritizing_a_research_agenda_on_built.pdf
Adobe PDF, 405.99 KB
CC BY 4.0
SM6_Barnett_2023_Prioritizing_a_research_agenda_on_built.pdf
Adobe PDF, 139.74 KB
CC BY 4.0
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14802/25368
Relation URI
DOI
10.1186/s12966-023-01533-y
Source URL
https://Background The growth of urban dwelling populations globally has led to rapid increases of research and policy initiatives addressing associations between the built environment and physical activity (PA). Given this rapid proliferation, it is important to identify priority areas and research questions for moving the field forward. The objective of this study was to identify and compare research priorities on the built environment and PA among researchers and knowledge users (e.g., policy makers, practitioners). Methods Between September 2022 and April 2023, a three-round, modified Delphi survey was conducted among two independent panels of international researchers (n = 38) and knowledge users (n = 23) to identify similarities and differences in perceived research priorities on the built environment and PA and generate twin ‘top 10’ lists of the most important research needs. Results From a broad range of self-identified issues, both panels ranked in common the most pressing research priorities including stronger study designs such as natural experiments, research that examines inequalities and inequities, establishing the cost effectiveness of interventions, safety and injuries related to engagement in active transportation (AT), and considerations for climate change and climate adaptation. Additional priorities identified by researchers included: implementation science, research that incorporates Indigenous perspectives, land-use policies, built environments that support active aging, and participatory research. Additional priorities identified by knowledge users included: built environments and PA among people living with disabilities and a need for national data on trip chaining, multi-modal travel, and non-work or school-related AT. Conclusions Five common research priorities between the two groups emerged, including (1) to better understand causality, (2) interactions with the natural environment, (3) economic evaluations, (4) social disparities, and (5) preventable AT-related injuries. The findings may help set directions for future research, interdisciplinary and intersectoral collaborations, and funding opportunities.
Event URL
Open Access Status
Published as ‘gold’ (paid) open access
License
File Access
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Notes
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.