Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Item

The establishment of the judicial appointments commission in Malaysia to improve the constitutional method of appointing the judges of the superior courts : A critical study

Bari, M. Ershadul
Bari, M. Ehteshamul
Naz, Safia
Citations
Google Scholar:
Altmetric:
Abstract
The Judicial Appointments Commission was established in Malaysia in 2009 to ensure unbiased selection of judicial candidates for the consideration of the Prime Minister, who has the final say regarding the appointment of judges to the superior courts. But the provisions concerning Prime Minister’s power to appoint the majority of the members of the Commission and his unfettered power of removing four of the five appointed members without assigning any reason, have calculatedly been devised for ensuring the selection of judicial candidates having right political patronage in accordance with the covert wishes of the Prime Minister. Furthermore, the Prime Minister’s power of rejecting the Commission’s recommendations of multiple candidates renders the undertaking of a lengthy process of selection unproductive and useless. Thus the Judicial Appointments Commission has become a superfluous body with an ineffective modus operandi to attain the stipulated objectives of improving and complementing the constitutional method of appointing judges to the superior courts. Since the Federal Constitution of Malaysia has not empowered the Parliament to enact a law providing for the establishment of a Judicial Appointments Commission, it also appears that the Judicial Appointments Commission Act 2009 is an invalid piece of legislation.
Keywords
Date
2015
Type
Journal article
Journal
Commonwealth Law Bulletin
Book
Volume
41
Issue
2
Page Range
231-252
Article Number
ACU Department
Thomas More Law School
Faculty of Law and Business
Relation URI
Source URL
Event URL
Open Access Status
License
All rights reserved
File Access
Controlled
Notes