Planned care for obesity and cardiovascular risk reduction using a stepped-down approach: a randomized-controlled trial

Journal article


Liu, Jie, Godino, Job G., Norman, Gregory J., Hill, Linda, Calfas, Karen J., Sallis, Jim, Arredondo, Elva M., Rock, Cheryl L., Criqui, Michael H., Zhu, Shu-Hong, Griffiths, Kenneth, Covin, Jennifer, Dillon, Lindsay W. and Patrick, Kevin. (2018). Planned care for obesity and cardiovascular risk reduction using a stepped-down approach: a randomized-controlled trial. Preventive Medicine. 114, pp. 223 - 231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.07.015
AuthorsLiu, Jie, Godino, Job G., Norman, Gregory J., Hill, Linda, Calfas, Karen J., Sallis, Jim, Arredondo, Elva M., Rock, Cheryl L., Criqui, Michael H., Zhu, Shu-Hong, Griffiths, Kenneth, Covin, Jennifer, Dillon, Lindsay W. and Patrick, Kevin
Abstract

Primary care-based approaches to address concurrent obesity and cardiovascular disease risk factors (CVDRFs) that begin with a high intensity intervention that is subsequently decreased (i.e., stepped-down) if weight loss is achieved have not been rigorously examined. Our study is a 20-month, single-blind randomized controlled trial at five primary care clinics in San Diego, CA, in 2013, where 262 obese adults (aged 25–70 years; 32.1% male; 59.2% white) with at least one CVDRF were enrolled into planned care for obesity and risk reduction (PCORR) using a stepped-down approach or enhanced usual care (EUC). All patients received physician recommendations for weight loss and CVDRFs. EUC patients (n = 132) received an individual session with a health educator every 4 months. PCORR patients (n = 130) received individual and group sessions (in-person, mail, telephone, and email) in three steps, characterized by less contact if success was achieved. At 20 months, 40.7%, 23.8%, and 15.4% of PCORR patients were in steps 1, 2, and 3, respectively (25.2% were lost to follow-up). PCORR resulted in a between-group difference in reduction in body weight of 6.1% [95% CI, 5.3 to 6.9] compared to EUC 2.8% [95% CI, 2.0 to 3.6] p = 0.007, with a greater reduction in BMI (35.2 [95% CI, 34.4 to 35.9] to 33.7 [95% CI, 32.9 to 34.5] kg/m2) than EUC (36.0 [95% CI, 35.3 to 36.8] to 35.1 [95% CI, 34.3 to 35.9] kg/m2), as indicated by a significant treatment by time interaction (p = 0.009). PCORR resulted in greater weight loss over 20 months than EUC.
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01134029

KeywordsObesity; Randomized controlled trial; Weight loss; Cardiovascular disease risk factors
Year2018
JournalPreventive Medicine
Journal citation114, pp. 223 - 231
PublisherElsevier
ISSN0091-7435
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.07.015
Scopus EID2-s2.0-85050716514
Page range223 - 231
Research GroupMary MacKillop Institute for Health Research
Publisher's version
File Access Level
Controlled
Place of publicationNetherlands
EditorsE. L. Franco
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/852w5/planned-care-for-obesity-and-cardiovascular-risk-reduction-using-a-stepped-down-approach-a-randomized-controlled-trial

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 99
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 57
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as