Why the world needs negative political theology

Journal article


Newheiser, David 2020. Why the world needs negative political theology. Modern Theology. 36 (1), pp. 5 - 12. https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12579
AuthorsNewheiser, David
Abstract

[Extract] Some theorists argue that religion relates to politics in one of two ways: either it asserts its authority over the public sphere or it withdraws from the world in preference for spiritual concerns.1 In response, this special issue offers an expanded vision of what political theology can contribute to public reflection. Against those who appropriate divine authority in support of a given regime, Jewish and Christian negative theology argues that God is radically elusive. Where resistance movements sometimes struggle to transition from opposition to governance, negative theology models a critique that allows for robust affirmation. Although the tradition does not directly address democratic politics, it demonstrates that a commitment to radical transformation does not rule out the compromise required to enact concrete policies. In this way, negative theology offers resources for addressing the crises that currently threaten democratic politics in the West. The contributors to this special issue suggest that, in contrast to quietism and theocracy, negative political theology can contribute to the politics of pluralist democracies. By design, however, they do not speak with one voice. The authors met together in 2017 for four days of intensive conversation.2 The discussion of each paper was preceded by a prepared response, and the conversation that followed was energetic and unpredictable. At the end of each day we ate, drank, and talked together, and the community that formed enriched our conversations in turn. These fissiparous papers display the benefits of this process, and the response that follows each one conveys the push‐and‐pull of genuine collaboration. Because the authors differ in their understanding of negative theology, political theology, and disciplinary identity, this introduction does not attempt to harmonize the contents of this special issue. Instead, I will describe what I believe it offers the world.

Year2020
JournalModern Theology
Journal citation36 (1), pp. 5 - 12
PublisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd
ISSN0266-7177
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12579
Scopus EID2-s2.0-85074843334
Page range5 - 12
Research GroupInstitute for Religion and Critical Inquiry
Place of publicationUnited Kingdom
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/85yxy/why-the-world-needs-negative-political-theology

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 0
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Desacralizing political theology: Dionysius the Areopagite and Giorgio Agamben
Newheiser, David 2020. Desacralizing political theology: Dionysius the Areopagite and Giorgio Agamben. Modern Theology. 36 (1), pp. 76 - 89. https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12506
Hope in a secular age: Deconstruction, negative theology, and the future of faith
Newheiser, David 2019. Hope in a secular age: Deconstruction, negative theology, and the future of faith. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Derrida and the danger of religion
Newheiser, David 2018. Derrida and the danger of religion. Journal of the American Academy of Religion. 86 (1), pp. 42 - 61. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfx026
Foucault, Gary Becker and the critique of neoliberalism
Newheiser, David Andrew 2016. Foucault, Gary Becker and the critique of neoliberalism. Theory, Culture and Society. 33 (5), pp. 3 - 21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276415619997
Eckhart, Derrida and the Gift of Love
Newheiser, David 2015. Eckhart, Derrida and the Gift of Love. in: D Newheiser and E Bugyis (ed.) Desire, Faith and the Darkness of God United States of America: University of Notre Dame Press. pp. 430 - 456
Sexuality and Christian Tradition: Innovation and Fidelity, Ancient and Modern
Newheiser, David 2015. Sexuality and Christian Tradition: Innovation and Fidelity, Ancient and Modern. Journal of Religious Ethics. 43 (1), pp. 122 - 145. https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12088
Conceiving Transformaton without Triumphalism : Joachim of Fiore Against Gianni Vattimo
Newheiser, David Andrew 2014. Conceiving Transformaton without Triumphalism : Joachim of Fiore Against Gianni Vattimo. The Heythrop Journal: a bi-monthly review of philosophy and theology. 55 (4), pp. 650 - 662. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2265.2011.00690.x
Conceiving Transformaton without Triumphalism: Joachim of Fiore Against Gianni Vattimo
Newheiser, David 2014. Conceiving Transformaton without Triumphalism: Joachim of Fiore Against Gianni Vattimo. The Heythrop Journal: a bi-monthly review of philosophy and theology. 55 (4), pp. 650 - 662. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2265.2011.00690.x
Foucault and the practice of patristics
Newheiser, David 2013. Foucault and the practice of patristics. in: M. Vinzent (ed.) The genres of late antique literature: Foucault and the practice of patristics ; Patristic studies in Latin America ; Historica Leuven Peeters. pp. 81 - 87
Eschatology and the Areopagite: Interpreting the Dionysian hierarchies in terms of time
Newheiser, David 2013. Eschatology and the Areopagite: Interpreting the Dionysian hierarchies in terms of time. in: M Vincent (ed.) Studia Patristica LXVIII Belgium: Peeters Publishing. pp. 215 - 221
Eckhart, Derrida and the Gift of Love
Newheiser, David 2012. Eckhart, Derrida and the Gift of Love. The Heythrop Journal: a bi-monthly review of philosophy and theology. 56 (6), pp. 1010 - 1021. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2265.2012.00754.x
Time and the responsibilities of reading: Revisiting Derrida and the Dionysius
Newheiser, David 2011. Time and the responsibilities of reading: Revisiting Derrida and the Dionysius. in: S. Douglass and M. Ludlow (ed.) Reading the Church Fathers London, United Kingdom: T&T Clark International. pp. 23 - 43
Ambivalence in Dionysius the Areopagite : The Limitations of a Liturgical Reading
Newheiser, David Andrew 2010. Ambivalence in Dionysius the Areopagite : The Limitations of a Liturgical Reading. in: F Young, M Edwards and P Parvis (ed.) Studia Patristica XLVIII Belgium: Peeters Publishing. pp. 211 - 216