The role of group size in reactions to ostracism and inclusion
Journal article
Tobin, Stephanie, McDermott, Sarah and French, Luke. (2017). The role of group size in reactions to ostracism and inclusion. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. 21(7), pp. 1014 - 1033. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217702723
Authors | Tobin, Stephanie, McDermott, Sarah and French, Luke |
---|---|
Abstract | Three experiments examined the effects of group size on reactions to ostracism and inclusion. Participants engaged in an online introduction activity with 2 or 6 other people and received likes from everyone (inclusion) or no one (ostracism). In Studies 1 and 2, group size had a significant effect on need satisfaction only when participants were ostracized, with larger groups threatening needs to a greater extent. These effects were evident during and immediately after the task, but not after a reflection period and delay. In Study 3, being ostracized by a larger group increased sadness and anger only when ostracism was public. Together, these results indicate that people react more negatively to ostracism by larger groups, but do not reap greater benefits in terms of need satisfaction or affect when included by larger groups. Implications for the ostracism literature and social media use are discussed. |
Keywords | belonging; group size; ostracism |
Year | 2017 |
Journal | Group Processes and Intergroup Relations |
Journal citation | 21 (7), pp. 1014 - 1033 |
Publisher | Sage Publications Ltd. |
ISSN | 1461-7188 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217702723 |
Page range | 1014 - 1033 |
Publisher's version | File Access Level Controlled |
Place of publication | United Kingdom |
https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8689x/the-role-of-group-size-in-reactions-to-ostracism-and-inclusion
Restricted files
Publisher's version
76
total views0
total downloads0
views this month0
downloads this month