Reasons or fittingness first?
Rowland, Richard. (2017). Reasons or fittingness first? Ethics: an international journal of social, political, and legal philosophy. 128(1), pp. 212 - 229. https://doi.org/10.1086/692949
Conor McHugh and Jonathan Way argue that we should put fittingness rather than reasons first because we can provide an account of the evaluative in terms of the normative only if we put fittingness rather than reasons first. I argue that it is no more difficult to provide an account of the evaluative in terms of the normative if we put reasons rather than fittingness first.
|Journal||Ethics: an international journal of social, political, and legal philosophy|
|Journal citation||128 (1), pp. 212 - 229|
|Publisher||University of Chicago Press|
|Digital Object Identifier (DOI)||https://doi.org/10.1086/692949|
|Open access||Open access|
|Page range||212 - 229|
|Research Group||Institute for Religion and Critical Inquiry|
|Place of publication||United States of America|
0views this month
2downloads this month