Reasons or fittingness first?

Journal article


Cosker-Rowland, Rach. (2017). Reasons or fittingness first? Ethics: an international journal of social, political, and legal philosophy. 128(1), pp. 212 - 229. https://doi.org/10.1086/692949
AuthorsCosker-Rowland, Rach
Abstract

Conor McHugh and Jonathan Way argue that we should put fittingness rather than reasons first because we can provide an account of the evaluative in terms of the normative only if we put fittingness rather than reasons first. I argue that it is no more difficult to provide an account of the evaluative in terms of the normative if we put reasons rather than fittingness first.

Year2017
JournalEthics: an international journal of social, political, and legal philosophy
Journal citation128 (1), pp. 212 - 229
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press
ISSN0014-1704
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1086/692949
Open accessPublished as non-open access
Research or scholarlyResearch
Page range212 - 229
Research GroupInstitute for Religion and Critical Inquiry
Publisher's version
License
All rights reserved
File Access Level
Open
Output statusPublished
Place of publicationUnited States of America
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8q4q0/reasons-or-fittingness-first

Download files


Publisher's version
OA_Cosker-Rowland_2017_Reasons_or_fittingness_first.pdf
License: All rights reserved
File access level: Open

  • 111
    total views
  • 268
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as