Evidence base and practice variation in acute care processes for knee and hip arthroplasty surgeries

Journal article


Mayer, Marcel, Naylor, Justine, Harris, Ian, Badge, Helen, Adie, Sam, Mills, Kathryn and Descallar, Joseph. (2017). Evidence base and practice variation in acute care processes for knee and hip arthroplasty surgeries. PLoS ONE. 12(7), pp. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180090
AuthorsMayer, Marcel, Naylor, Justine, Harris, Ian, Badge, Helen, Adie, Sam, Mills, Kathryn and Descallar, Joseph
Abstract

Background
Lack of evidence contributes to unnecessary variation in treatment costs and outcomes. This study aimed to identify from interventions historically used for total knee or hip arthroplasty (TKA, THA): i) if routine use is supported by high-level evidence; ii) whether surgeon use aligns with the evidence.

Methods
Part 1: Systematic search of electronic library databases for systematic reviews and practice guidelines concerning seven acute-care interventions. Intervention-specific recommendations concerning routine use were extracted by assessors. Part 2: Prospective medical record audit of the acute-care received by 1900 patients involving 120 orthopaedic surgeons. Surgeon use per intervention was summarized using caterpillar plots. Surgeon-specific routine and non-routine use was defined as use in ≥ 90% and ≤ 10% of patients, respectively. Primary analysis included only surgeons contributing ≥ 10 patients.

Results
Continuous passive motion (TKA): Routine use not recommended; 85.7% of surgeons did not use it routinely. Tranexamic Acid: Routine use recommended; 26.9% of surgeons used it routinely. Cryotherapy: Routine use not recommended; 45.7% of surgeons used it routinely for TKA; 31.8% used it routinely for THA. Intra-articular drainage: Routine use not recommended for TKA, but possible benefits for THA; 5.7% of surgeons used it routinely for TKA, 0.0% used it routinely for THA. Antibiotic loaded bone cement: Routine use for TKA not supported, recommendations for use for THA are inconsistent; 90.0% of surgeons used it routinely for TKA, 100.0% used it routinely for THA. Patella resurfacing (TKA): No recommendation could be made; 57.1% of surgeons routinely resurfaced the patella. Indwelling urinary catheterisation: Routine use recommended; 59.6% of surgeons used it routinely.

Conclusion
Recommendations for routine use or not exist for some of the acute-care interventions examined. Surgeon practices vary widely even in the presence of high-level recommendations. It is unclear whether further evidence alone would lessen unwarranted practice variation.

Year2017
JournalPLoS ONE
Journal citation12 (7), pp. 1-21
PublisherPublic Library of Science
ISSN1932-6203
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180090
Scopus EID2-s2.0-85030448095
Open accessPublished as ‘gold’ (paid) open access
Research or scholarlyResearch
Page range1-21
Publisher's version
License
File Access Level
Open
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Online19 Jul 2017
Publication process dates
Accepted10 Jun 2017
Deposited01 Sep 2021
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8wqy5/evidence-base-and-practice-variation-in-acute-care-processes-for-knee-and-hip-arthroplasty-surgeries

Download files


Publisher's version
OA_Mayer_2017_Evidence_base_and_practice_variation_in.pdf
License: CC BY 4.0
File access level: Open

  • 26
    total views
  • 22
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as