Expressions of a fascist imaginary : Adorno’s unsettling of cathexis

Journal article

Poe, Andrew. (2018). Expressions of a fascist imaginary : Adorno’s unsettling of cathexis. South Atlantic Quarterly. 117(4), pp. 815-832.
AuthorsPoe, Andrew

What is the structure of prejudice? In his 1951 essay, “Freudian Theory and the Pattern of Fascist Propaganda,” Theodor Adorno reflects on the mass psychological basis of fascism. Within that psychology, he identifies a logic of ego “enlargement,” which relates directly to the structure of prejudice. Fascism depends on affective attachments, magnified by prejudice (a magnification that takes place through identification with a leader). This is a clear theme in Adorno’s critical theory. In his previous work in The Authoritarian Personality, Adorno set out the task to discover differential patterns within the general structure of prejudice, with a specific focus on the function of prejudice. As a resource to encounter this theorizing of prejudice, I turn to Adorno’s “Prejudice in the Interview Material” (chapter 16 of The Authoritarian Personality). This is one of several solo-authored chapters of Adorno’s in the Authoritarian Personality project, where Adorno attempts “to examine the relation of anti-minority prejudice to broader ideological and characterological patterns.” On the surface, this chapter is quite literally a reporting of prejudice in the voices of interview subjects. But, I argue, Adorno’s review seems to highlight a dispersal of prejudicial energies, once directed into feelings of anti-Semitism, now into new resources of social, political, and economic division. Clear pathways for this dispersal form through what Adorno names as cathexis. This is a microscopic moment in the overarching argument of The Authoritarian Personality. But, as I hope to show, Adorno’s subtle engagement with this psychoanalytic referent for psychic and emotional energy invested in a person or thing can serve as a resource for making sense of the pathways of prejudice that fascism depends on. Here, I offer a reading of Adorno’s attention to cathexis in prejudice formation as a pathway for fascist discourse, as well as the possibility of its interruption.

Keywordspolitical imagination; cathexis; Adorno; prejudice; fascism
JournalSouth Atlantic Quarterly
Journal citation117 (4), pp. 815-832
PublisherDuke University Press
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Scopus EID2-s2.0-85056571934
Research or scholarlyResearch
Page range815-832
Publisher's version
All rights reserved
File Access Level
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Publication process dates
Deposited20 May 2022
Permalink -

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 80
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

Context for a critique of political theology
Michelbach, Philip and Poe, Andrew. (2022). Context for a critique of political theology. Theory and Event. 25(2), pp. 444-469.
Un-represent : Theorizing the reason of political fanaticism
Poe, Andrew. (2021). Un-represent : Theorizing the reason of political fanaticism. Distinktion. 22(3), pp. 358-375.
Poe, Andrew. (2018). Enthusiasm. Krisis. 2018(2), pp. 46-49.
New authority : Hamlet’s politics with (and against) Carl Schmitt
Michelbach, Philip A. and Poe, Andrew. (2016). New authority : Hamlet’s politics with (and against) Carl Schmitt. Journal for Cultural Research. 20(3), pp. 247-265.