Clinician perspectives of barriers to effective implementation of a rapid response system in an academic health centre : A focus group study

Journal article


Rihari-Thomas, John, DiGiacomo, Michelle, Phillips, Jane, Newton, Phillip and Davidson, Patricia M.. (2017). Clinician perspectives of barriers to effective implementation of a rapid response system in an academic health centre : A focus group study. International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 6(8), pp. 447-456. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2016.156
AuthorsRihari-Thomas, John, DiGiacomo, Michelle, Phillips, Jane, Newton, Phillip and Davidson, Patricia M.
Abstract

Background: Systemic and structural issues of rapid response system (RRS) models can hinder implementation. This study sought to understand the ways in which acute care clinicians (physicians and nurses) experience and negotiate care for deteriorating patients within the RRS.

Methods: Physicians and nurses working within an Australian academic health centre within a jurisdictional-based model of clinical governance participated in focus group interviews. Verbatim transcripts were analysed using thematic content analysis.

Results: Thirty-four participants (21 physicians and 13 registered nurses [RNs]) participated in six focus groups over five weeks in 2014. Implementing the RRS in daily practice was a process of informal communication and negotiation in spite of standardised protocols. Themes highlighted several systems or organisational-level barriers to an effective RRS, including (1) responsibility is inversely proportional to clinical experience; (2) actions around system flexibility contribute to deviation from protocol; (3) misdistribution of resources leads to perceptions of inadequate staffing levels inhibiting full optimisation of the RRS; and (4) poor communication and documentation of RRS increases clinician workloads.

Conclusion: Implementing a RRS is complex and multifactorial, influenced by various inter- and intra-professional factors, staffing models and organisational culture. The RRS is not a static model; it is both reflexive and iterative, perpetually transforming to meet healthcare consumer and provider demands and local unit contexts and needs. Requiring more than just a strong initial implementation phase, new models of care such as a RRS demand good governance processes, ongoing support and regular evaluation and refinement. Cultural, organizational and professional factors, as well as systems-based processes, require consideration if RRSs are to achieve their intended outcomes in dynamic healthcare settings.

KeywordsMedical Emergency Team; MET; qualitative research; healthcare quality improvement
Year01 Jan 2017
2017
JournalInternational Journal of Health Policy and Management
Journal citation6 (8), pp. 447-456
PublisherKerman University of Medical Sciences
ISSN2322-5939
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2016.156
PubMed ID28812844
Scopus EID2-s2.0-85029214084
PubMed Central IDPMC5553213
Open accessOpen access
Page range447-456
Publisher's version
License
File Access Level
Open
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Online01 Jan 2017
Publication process dates
Accepted25 Dec 2016
Deposited04 Sep 2023
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8z94q/clinician-perspectives-of-barriers-to-effective-implementation-of-a-rapid-response-system-in-an-academic-health-centre-a-focus-group-study

Download files


Publisher's version
  • 16
    total views
  • 9
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 2
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as