On the viability of the No Alternatives Argument
Journal article
Vasudev Menon, Tushar. (2019). On the viability of the No Alternatives Argument. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 76, pp. 69-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.10.005
Authors | Vasudev Menon, Tushar |
---|---|
Abstract | If we cannot directly empirically test the claims of a particular scientific theory directly, then it would be nice to have some other criteria with which to assess its viability. In his 2013 book, String Theory and the Scientific Method, Richard Dawid aims to develop such criteria, with an eye to vindicating research programmess in disciplines where direct empirical data is scant or non-existent. In an accompanying paper, Dawid, Hartmann and Sprenger formalise Dawid's so-called ‘No Alternatives Argument’ (NAA) using a generalised Bayesian framework, as a first step towards formalising Dawid's entire research programme (which itself relies on two further arguments). In this paper, I argue that the formalisation of the NAA cannot play the central role in Dawid's programme as intended. This is based on the observation that not all confirmation is non-negligible confirmation. For Dawid's programme to be useful, it must demonstrate the viability not just of non-empirical theory confirmation, but of non-negligible non-empirical theory confirmation. I argue that Dawid et al.‘s appeal to Bayesian confirmation theory to formalise his NAA cannot guarantee non-negligible confirmation. As a result, I conclude that if Dawid's overall project is to succeed, it must do so without the NAA formalised in this way. |
Keywords | theory; No Alternatives Argument; theory confirmation |
Year | 01 Jan 2019 |
Journal | Studies in History and Philosophy of Science |
Journal citation | 76, pp. 69-75 |
Publisher | Elsevier Ltd. (UK) |
ISSN | 0039-3681 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.10.005 |
Web address (URL) | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039368118301109 |
Open access | Published as non-open access |
Research or scholarly | Research |
Page range | 69-75 |
Publisher's version | License All rights reserved File Access Level Controlled |
Output status | Published |
Publication dates | |
23 Sep 2019 | |
Publication process dates | |
Accepted | 29 Oct 2018 |
Deposited | 26 Aug 2024 |
Additional information | © 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All Rights Reserved. |
Place of publication | United Kingdom |
https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/90x23/on-the-viability-of-the-no-alternatives-argument
Restricted files
Publisher's version
8
total views0
total downloads1
views this month0
downloads this month