Philosophy, the Conquest, and the Meaning of Modernity A Commentary on Anti-Cartesian Meditations: On the Origin of the Philosophical Anti-Discourse of Modernity by Enrique Dussel

Journal article


Alcoff, Linda. (2013). Philosophy, the Conquest, and the Meaning of Modernity A Commentary on Anti-Cartesian Meditations: On the Origin of the Philosophical Anti-Discourse of Modernity by Enrique Dussel. Human Architecture: Journal of the sociology of self-knowledge. 11(1), pp. 57 - 66.
AuthorsAlcoff, Linda
Abstract

This is a commentary on the article "Anti-Cartesian Meditations: On the Origins of the Philosophical Anti-Discourse of Modernity" by Enrique Dussel published in this issue of the journal. According to the author, Dussel's Anti-Cartesian Meditations suggest the following conclusions for a revisioning of the discipline of philosophy: (1) If, as Rorty suggests, the meaning of philosophy is simply the history of philosophy or whatever philosophers discuss, then European philosophy does not understand what philosophy is because it does not understand its own history of philosophy; (2) Given that Descartes' skeptical, reasoning "I" is produced through conquest, and the claim of comparative supremacy of the specific individual against its cultural others, this is hardly a good foundation for a truly rational modernity. Such a source of reasoning is neither sufficient nor reliable in terms of knowing one's self or knowing others, or certainly in knowing how one's own ideas and beliefs are related to or influenced by those of others; (3) The revision of the history of rationalism, modernity, and epistemology suggested in Dussel's account suggests a new way to understand the relationship and connection between secularism and rationalism, loosening the hold of the sometimes dogmatic assumption that secularism is the only route to rationalism; (4) Despite the intensity of Dussel's critique, his work also suggests that there may be a way to usefully distinguish the modern from Modernity, or in other words to separate a genuinely normative sense of the modern as a reflexive operation of critique from the colonialist Modernity with its legacy of self-justification and false consciousness. In this case, there may be a way to salvage philosophy after all.

Year2013
JournalHuman Architecture: Journal of the sociology of self-knowledge
Journal citation11 (1), pp. 57 - 66
PublisherOkcir Press
ISSN1540-5699
Page range57 - 66
Research GroupInstitute for Social Justice
Publisher's version
File Access Level
Controlled
Place of publicationUnited States of America
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/86qxw/philosophy-the-conquest-and-the-meaning-of-modernity-a-commentary-on-anti-cartesian-meditations-on-the-origin-of-the-philosophical-anti-discourse-of-modernity-by-enrique-dussel

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 54
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 2
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

Rape and resistance
Alcoff, Linda. (2018). Rape and resistance Wiley.
Vallega, Dussel, and radical exteriority
Alcoff, Linda. (2017). Vallega, Dussel, and radical exteriority. Inter-American Journal of Philosophy. 8(2), pp. 12 - 23.
Philosophy and philosophical practice: eurocentrism as an epistemology of ignorance
Alcoff, Linda. (2017). Philosophy and philosophical practice: eurocentrism as an epistemology of ignorance. In In I. J. Kidd, J. Medina and G. Pohlhaus jr. (Ed.). Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice pp. 397 - 408 Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315212043
Decolonizing feminist philosophy
Alcoff, Linda. (2017). Decolonizing feminist philosophy. In In M. A. McLaren (Ed.). Decolonizing Feminism: Transnational Feminism and Globalization pp. 21 - 36 Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
What's wrong with philosophy?
Alcoff, Linda Sharon. (2016). What's wrong with philosophy? In In P. Catapano and S. Critchley (Ed.). The Stone Reader: Modern Philosophy in 133 Arguments pp. 37 - 39 W. W. Norton & Company.
The future of whiteness
Alcoff, Linda. (2015). The future of whiteness Polity Press.
The future of whiteness
Alcoff, Linda. (2014). The future of whiteness. In In E. S. Lee (Ed.). Living Alterities: Phenomenology, Embodiment, and Race pp. 255 - 281 Suny.
Foucault's normative epistemology
Alcoff, Linda. (2013). Foucault's normative epistemology. In In C. Falzon, T. O'Leary and J. Sawicki (Ed.). A companion to Foucault pp. 207 - 225 Wiley-Blackwell.
Afterword The Black/White Binary and Antiblack Racism
Alcoff, Linda. (2013). Afterword The Black/White Binary and Antiblack Racism. Critical Philosophy of Race. 1(1), pp. 121 - 124. https://doi.org/10.5325/critphilrace.1.1.0121
Enrique Dussel's Transmodernism
Alcoff, Linda. (2012). Enrique Dussel's Transmodernism. Transmodernity. 1(3), pp. 60 - 68.
Anti-Latino racism
Alcoff, Linda. (2012). Anti-Latino racism. In In A. M. Isasi-Diaz and E. Mendieta (Ed.). Decolonizing epistemologies: Latina/o theology and philosophy pp. 107 - 126 Fordham University Press.
Alien and alienated
Alcoff, Linda. (2012). Alien and alienated. In In G. Yancy (Ed.). Reframing the practice of philosophy: Bodies of color, bodies of knowledge pp. 23 - 44 State University of New York Press.