Regulating undercover policing: Subjects, rights and governmentality

Journal article


Murphy, Brendon 2020. Regulating undercover policing: Subjects, rights and governmentality. Critical Criminology. 28, pp. 65 - 84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-020-09504-6
AuthorsMurphy, Brendon
Abstract

One of Foucault’s many unfinished projects was an analysis of the links between law, power and subjectivity. This article aims to make a contribution to Foucauldian jurisprudence by asking the question: in what ways does law construct identity? Using the regulation of undercover police investigation as an example, this article considers the intersection between three core rationalities within legal systems—rights, derogation and authorization—as critical moments in the governance of human beings, mobilized through legal architectures. Here, we find identities constructed, tested and applied in a multilateral relationship as intended and unintended consequences of the technologies of law. In this space, we not only see the mechanisms of law operating for the purpose of mobilizing power relations, but we also observe the myriad ways in which the architecture of law promoting rights operates as a system of governance that reveals rights claims as hollow, impeachable and ephemeral. The article concludes by considering rights, derogation and authorization as key components of Foucauldian jurisprudence—a distinct governmentality, where law articulates what rights are available and their associated mechanics, the mechanisms of adjudication and exception, and the formal modes of counter-conduct.

Year2020
JournalCritical Criminology
Journal citation28, pp. 65 - 84
PublisherSpringer Netherlands
ISSN1205-8629
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-020-09504-6
Scopus EID2-s2.0-85083966705
Page range65 - 84
Research GroupThomas More Law School
Place of publicationNetherlands
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/88qy9/regulating-undercover-policing-subjects-rights-and-governmentality

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 0
    total views
  • 2
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 2
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Constructing consent in the Australian Capital Territory
Murphy, Brendon 2020. Constructing consent in the Australian Capital Territory. Canberra Law Review. 17 (1), pp. 23 - 42.
Lawfare, standing and environmental discourse: A phronetic analysis
Murphy, Brendon and McGee, Jeff 2018. Lawfare, standing and environmental discourse: A phronetic analysis. University of Tasmania Law Review. 37 (2), pp. 131 - 168.
Soft law, responsibility and the biopolitics of front-of-pack food labels
Murphy, Brendon and Sanderson, Jay 2017. Soft law, responsibility and the biopolitics of front-of-pack food labels. Griffith Law Review. 26 (3), pp. 355 - 377. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2017.1436371
Retaining and expanding breach of peace
Murphy, Brendon 2017. Retaining and expanding breach of peace. Criminal Law Journal. 41 (4), pp. 222 - 241.
Confessions to Mr Big: A new rule of evidence?
Murphy, Brendon and Anderson, John 2016. Confessions to Mr Big: A new rule of evidence? International Journal of Evidence and Proof. 20 (1), pp. 29 - 48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365712715613485
Deceptive Apparatus: Foucauldian Perspectives on Law, Authorised Crime and the Rationalities of Undercover Investigation
Murphy, Brendon 2016. Deceptive Apparatus: Foucauldian Perspectives on Law, Authorised Crime and the Rationalities of Undercover Investigation. Griffith Law Review. 25 (2), pp. 223 - 244. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2016.1194956