Are the T and E dimensions being recognised in the Australian STEM Education Discourse?

Conference item


Barlow, John Leslie and Ellis, David. (2016). Are the T and E dimensions being recognised in the Australian STEM Education Discourse? Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research, Magill Campus, University of SA. Australia: Design and Technology Teachers Association - Australia. pp. 8 - 14
AuthorsBarlow, John Leslie and Ellis, David
Abstract

STEM education ostensibly consists of four ‘interrelated’ subject disciplines. However Science, and to a lesser extent Mathematics have traditionally dominated over the Technology and Engineering (the T and the E) dimensions, as they have become less visible in contributing to the STEM education space. While there are a number of significant factors which have supported the continuation of this situation, a contemporary and relevant STEM education space needs to be seen as one which identifies and actively supports both the interaction between and the appropriate integration of the four subject disciplines with equal status. This paper will present a brief overview of the evolution of STEM education with an emphasis on recent Australian Government publications, analysing whether Technology and Engineering learning experiences are being harnessed to actively integrate and support a STEM education space or not. This analysis begs the question whether STEM education is being supported in Australia?

Year2016
JournalCreating Contexts For Learning in Technology Education
PublisherDesign and Technology Teachers Association - Australia
Publisher's version
File Access Level
Controlled
Page range8 - 14
ISBN9780994202727
Research GroupSchool of Arts
Place of publicationAustralia
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/892y0/are-the-t-and-e-dimensions-being-recognised-in-the-australian-stem-education-discourse

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 117
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

The unified national system: Implications for NSW technology teacher education
Barlow, John Leslie. (2016). The unified national system: Implications for NSW technology teacher education. Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research, Magill Campus, University of SA. Australia: Design and Technology Teachers Association - Australia. pp. 15 - 22
Challenging technological identities in contemporary technology teacher education
Barlow, John and von Mengersen, Belinda. (2014). Challenging technological identities in contemporary technology teacher education. In H Middleton (Ed.). Technology Education: Learning for life. Australia: Design and Technology Association of Australia and individual contributors. pp. 10 - 17
Confidence, mathematics and performance of engineering studies candidates at the New South Wales Higher School Certificate examination
Barlow, John. (2013). Confidence, mathematics and performance of engineering studies candidates at the New South Wales Higher School Certificate examination. In P. J. Williams and D. Gedera (Ed.). PATT 27: Technology Education for the Future: A Play on Sustainability. Christchurch, New Zealand: University of Waikato. pp. 44 - 51
Some thoughts on the diseconomy of the NSW technology education curriculum
Barlow, John. (2012). Some thoughts on the diseconomy of the NSW technology education curriculum. 7th Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research. Crowne Plaza Hotel, Surfers Paradise, Queensland, Australia 05 - 08 Dec 2021 QLD, Australia: Griffith University. pp. 33-41
Beyond VVA :Model and simulation users
Barlow, John. (2011). Beyond VVA :Model and simulation users. In F Chan, D Marinova and RS Anderssen (Ed.). Australia: The Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia ....
Design/Technology Education and The National Curriculum
Barlow, John Leslie. (2010). Design/Technology Education and The National Curriculum. Knowledge in Technology Education. Australia: Griffith University. pp. 18 - 26
Simplification :ethical implications for modelling and simulation
Barlow, John. (2009). Simplification :ethical implications for modelling and simulation. In RS Anderssen, R.D. Braddock and L.T.H. Newham (Ed.). Canberra, Australia: The Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia .... pp. 432 - 438
Some thoughts on sustaining Classroom Technology teachers
Barlow, John Leslie. (2008). Some thoughts on sustaining Classroom Technology teachers. In Howard Middleton and Margarita Pavlova (Ed.). Exploring Technology Education: Solutions to issues in a globalised world. Brisbane, Australia: Griffith University. pp. 10 - 18
Are we really attracting the 'right' student into Technology Teacher Education programs?
Barlow, John Leslie. (2006). Are we really attracting the 'right' student into Technology Teacher Education programs? Values in Technology Education 2006 Conference Proceedings. Queensland, Australia: Centre for Learning Research, Faculty of Education, Griffith University. pp. 11 - 17
Computer simulations; disclosure and duty of care
Barlow, John. (2006). Computer simulations; disclosure and duty of care. Australasian Journal of Information Systems. 13(2), pp. 183 - 192. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v13i2.51
Managing Innovation :It's Role in Pre-service Technology Teacher Education
Barlow, John Leslie. (2004). Managing Innovation :It's Role in Pre-service Technology Teacher Education. In Howard Middleton, Margarita Pavlova and Dick Roebuck (Ed.). Learning for Innovation in Technology Education: Proceedings of the 3rd Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research. Gold Coast, Australia: Centre for Learning Research, Faculty of Education, G.... pp. 38 - 46
Technology teacher education: Is it time to do a Maslow?
Barlow, John. (2002). Technology teacher education: Is it time to do a Maslow? In Howard Middleton, Margarita Pavlova and Dick Roebuck (Ed.). Learning in Technology Education: Challenges for the 21st Century. Brisbane, Australia: Centre for Technology Education Research Griffith University. pp. 9 - 16