Fitness to stand trial and disability discrimination : An international critique of Australia
Freckelton, Ian and Keyzer, Patrick. (2017). Fitness to stand trial and disability discrimination : An international critique of Australia. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. 24(5), pp. 770-783.
|Authors||Freckelton, Ian and Keyzer, Patrick|
In Noble v Australia (2016) the United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities determined that Australia was in violation of a series of its obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The decision was a response to a communication brought by an Indigenous man, Marlon Noble, who had been found unfit to stand trial, had not had the opportunity to plead not guilty, and had been detained in a prison for over a decade. This article reviews the reasoning in the decision, the subsequent response by the Australian government and an inquiry into Western Australia's fitness to stand trial legislation. It argues that reform is urgently required in jurisdictions that fail to accord procedural fairness and suitable assistance to persons whose disabilities may preclude their meaningful participation in the criminal justice system.
|Keywords||disability; discrimination; fitness to stand trial; intellectual disability; United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities|
|Journal||Psychiatry, Psychology and Law|
|Journal citation||24 (5), pp. 770-783|
All rights reserved
File Access Level
|Online||29 Oct 2017|
|Publication process dates|
|Deposited||06 Aug 2021|
3views this month
0downloads this month