The reception of Paul, Peter, and James in the Apostolic Fathers

Book chapter


Edsall, Benjamin. (2021). The reception of Paul, Peter, and James in the Apostolic Fathers. In In Bird, Michael F. and Harrower, Scott D. (Ed.). The Cambridge companion to : The apostolic fathers pp. 119-134 Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108554992.007
AuthorsEdsall, Benjamin
EditorsBird, Michael F. and Harrower, Scott D.
Abstract

Within the early Christian communities, according to the documents that bear witness to them, the figures of Paul, Peter, and James the brother of Jesus loom large. Already in Paul’s letter to the Galatians, Peter (Cephas) and James are noted as “pillars” of the church (Gal. 2.9) and are the only two apostles Paul deemed it necessary to meet during his first trip to Jerusalem (1.18–19). In subsequent decades and centuries, the importance of all three figures was continually reaffirmed through communal memory, traditions, and writings about them or attributed to them. Limited to the writings that comprise the Apostolic Fathers, however, their representation is somewhat sparser. Of the eleven authors now conventionally included among the Apostolic Fathers, five do not explicitly mention Paul, Peter or James at all. Considered individually, appeals to these figures are not evenly distributed: Peter and Paul appear variously while James is entirely absent, with the possible exception of one fragment from Papias, discussed below. Even within the letters of Ignatius, whose seven-letter corpus contains the majority of appeals to Peter and Paul in the Apostolic Fathers, only three or four of the seven mention Peter or Paul. All this amounts to the fact that roughly half of the authors or writings of the Apostolic Fathers do not feel the need to appeal explicitly to any of these apostolic figures in the course of their arguments, however much they may be indebted to them on the level of broader early Christian discourse. This is no doubt due, at least in part, to the artificial and somewhat arbitrary nature of the textual corpus labeled the “Apostolic Fathers,” which arose in the seventeenth century and whose textual contents were not fixed in convention until after the publication of the Didache in 1883. It is perhaps also a function of the nature of the works included in the collection: the occasional nature of the Ignatian letters, the appropriation of apocalyptic discourse in The Shepherd of Hermas, the presumption of many shared, and therefore unstated, traditions in all texts, etc.

Page range119-134
Year2021
Book titleThe Cambridge companion to : The apostolic fathers
PublisherCambridge University Press
Place of publicationCambridge, United Kingdom
SeriesCambridge companions to religion
ISSN9781108429535
9781108454452
9781108554992
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108554992.007
Publisher's version
License
All rights reserved
File Access Level
Controlled
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
OnlineMay 2021
Print2021
Publication process dates
Deposited01 Oct 2021
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8wwqy/the-reception-of-paul-peter-and-james-in-the-apostolic-fathers

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 119
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

New Temporalities and a Temporal (Re)Turn in New Testament Studies? TheCullmann/Bultmann Debate Revisited
Edsall, Benjamin Andrew. (2024). New Temporalities and a Temporal (Re)Turn in New Testament Studies? TheCullmann/Bultmann Debate Revisited. Harvard Theological Review. 117(3), pp. 631-654. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017816024000257
Introduction
Schröter, Jens, Edsall, Benjamin A. and Verheyden, Joseph. (2021). Introduction. In In Schröter, Jens, Edsall, Benjamin A. and Verheyden, Joseph (Ed.). Jews and Christians – Parting ways in the first two centuries CE? : Reflections on gains and losses of a model pp. 1-10 De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110742213
A liturgical update in Rufinus' translation of Origen's Commentary on Romans?
Edsall, Benjamin A.. (2021). A liturgical update in Rufinus' translation of Origen's Commentary on Romans? In In Fürst, Alfons (Ed.). Perspectives on Origen and the history of his reception pp. 161-171 Aschendorff Verlag.
“And it rushed in”: A new proposal for interpreting GJudas 57,24
Edsall, Benjamin Andrew. (2021). “And it rushed in”: A new proposal for interpreting GJudas 57,24. Zeitschrift fuer die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der Aelteren Kirche. 112(2), pp. 238-250. https://doi.org/10.1515/znw-2021-0014
Aphrahat and Pauline reception : 1 Corinthians 7 and baptismal reasoning in East and West
Edsall, Benjamin. (2021). Aphrahat and Pauline reception : 1 Corinthians 7 and baptismal reasoning in East and West. New Testament Studies. 67(3), pp. 407-423. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688521000047
Scribes, pharisees, sadducees and trypho : Jewish leadership and Jesus traditions in Justin’s construal of Christian and Jewish identity
Edsall, Benjamin A.. (2021). Scribes, pharisees, sadducees and trypho : Jewish leadership and Jesus traditions in Justin’s construal of Christian and Jewish identity. In In Barclay, John M. G. and Crabbe, Kylie (Ed.). The reception of Jewish tradition in the social imagination of the early Christians pp. 145-160 Bloomsbury T & T Clark. https://doi.org/10.5040/9780567696014.ch-008
Justin Martyr without the “Parting” or the “Ways”
Edsall, Benjamin A.. (2021). Justin Martyr without the “Parting” or the “Ways”. In In Schröter, Jens, Edsall, Benjamin A. and Verheyden, Joseph (Ed.). Jews and Christians : Parting ways in the first two centuries CE? : Reflections on the gains and losses of a model pp. 239-262 Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110742213-010
Clement and the Catechumenate in the Late Second Century
Edsall, Benjamin A.. (2020). Clement and the Catechumenate in the Late Second Century. In In Ayres, Lewis and Ward, H. Clifton (Ed.). The rise of the early christian intellectual pp. 101-127 De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110608632-008
The reception of Paul and early Christian initiation: History and hermeneutics
Edsall, Benjamin A.. (2019). The reception of Paul and early Christian initiation: History and hermeneutics Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108558525
Reading with a Forger: Christoph Pfaff and the reception of Colossians 2:16
Edsall, Benjamin A.. (2019). Reading with a Forger: Christoph Pfaff and the reception of Colossians 2:16. Journal of Biblical Literature. 138(4), pp. 845 - 862. https://doi.org/10.15699/jbl.1384.2019.9
Chrysostom's use of origen: Interpreting 1 Corinthians 4:6, gospel proof-texts, and a case for direct dependence
Edsall, Benjamin A.. (2019). Chrysostom's use of origen: Interpreting 1 Corinthians 4:6, gospel proof-texts, and a case for direct dependence. Journal of Theological Studies. 70(1), pp. 239 - 250. https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/flz005
Hermogenes the smith and narrative characterisation in the acts of Paul: A note on the reception of 2 Timothy
Edsall, Ben. (2018). Hermogenes the smith and narrative characterisation in the acts of Paul: A note on the reception of 2 Timothy. New Testament Studies. 64(1), pp. 108 - 121. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688517000248
This is not the end: The present age and the eschaton in Mark's narrative
Edsall, Ben. (2018). This is not the end: The present age and the eschaton in Mark's narrative. Catholic Biblical Quarterly. 80(3), pp. 429 - 447. https://doi.org/10.1353/cbq.2018.0091
(Not) Baptizing Thecla: Early interpretive efforts on 1 Cor 1:17
Edsall, Ben. (2017). (Not) Baptizing Thecla: Early interpretive efforts on 1 Cor 1:17. Vigiliae Christinane. 71(3), pp. 235 - 260. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700720-12341303
Persuasion and force in 4 Maccabees: Appropriating a political dialectic
Edsall, Ben. (2017). Persuasion and force in 4 Maccabees: Appropriating a political dialectic. Journal for the Study of Judaism. 48(1), pp. 92 - 112. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700631-12341137
Persuasion and Force in Acts: A response to C. Kavin Rowe
Edsall, Benjamin Andrew. (2016). Persuasion and Force in Acts: A response to C. Kavin Rowe. Catholic Biblical Quarterly. 78(3), pp. 483 - 499.
The songs we used to sing? Hymn 'traditions' and reception in Pauline Letters
Edsall, Benjamin and Strawbridge, Jennifer. (2015). The songs we used to sing? Hymn 'traditions' and reception in Pauline Letters. Journal for the Study of the New Testament. 37(3), pp. 290 - 311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142064X14567054
Review:Benjamin L White, Remembering Paul: Ancient and Modern Contests over the Image of the Apostle
Edsall, Ben. (2015). Review:Benjamin L White, Remembering Paul: Ancient and Modern Contests over the Image of the Apostle. Australian Biblical Review. 63, pp. 92 - 947.
Paul's witness to formative early Christian instruction
Edsall, Benjamin. In J Frey (Ed.). (2014). Paul's witness to formative early Christian instruction Mohr Siebeck.
Greco-Roman costume and Paul's Fraught Argument in 1 Corinthians 11.2-16
Edsall, Benjamin A.. (2013). Greco-Roman costume and Paul's Fraught Argument in 1 Corinthians 11.2-16. Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism. 9, pp. 132 - 146.
When cicero and St Paul agree: Intra-group litigation among the Luperci and the Corinthian believers
Edsall, Benjamin Andrew. (2013). When cicero and St Paul agree: Intra-group litigation among the Luperci and the Corinthian believers. Journal of Theological Studies. 64(1), pp. 25 - 36. https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/flt013
Paul's Rhetoric of Knowledge: The ΟΥΚ ΟΙΔΑΤΕ Question in 1 Corinthians 1
Edsall, Benjamin. (2013). Paul's Rhetoric of Knowledge: The ΟΥΚ ΟΙΔΑΤΕ Question in 1 Corinthians 1. Novum Testamentum. 55(3), pp. 252 - 271. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685365-12341426
Kerygma, catechesis and other things we used to find: Twentieth-century research on early Christian teaching since Alfred Seeberg (1903)
Edsall, Benjamin Andrew. (2012). Kerygma, catechesis and other things we used to find: Twentieth-century research on early Christian teaching since Alfred Seeberg (1903). Currents in Biblical Research. 10(3), pp. 410 - 441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476993X11420781