Beyond understanding

Journal article

Coakley, Sarah. (2021). Beyond understanding. Political Theology. 22(5), pp. 398-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/1462317X.2021.1955575
AuthorsCoakley, Sarah
Abstract

[Extract] In what follows in this response to Kilby, therefore, I shall first attempt to unpick a set of different accounts of “apophaticism” that co-exist confusingly within the key essays in this book; for its argument unfolds in several chapters devoted to this same theme.1 From here I shall be in a position to adjudicate on the persuasiveness of Kilby’s overall thesis, and finally to assess briefly – as is appropriate for this journal – what it all might mean for the specific project of “political theology.”

Year2021
JournalPolitical Theology
Journal citation22 (5), pp. 398-406
PublisherRoutledge
ISSN1462-317X
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1080/1462317X.2021.1955575
Scopus EID2-s2.0-85112059318
Research or scholarlyResearch
Page range398-406
Publisher's version
License
All rights reserved
File Access Level
Controlled
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Online05 Aug 2021
Publication process dates
Deposited02 Jun 2022
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8xxwz/beyond-understanding

Log in to edit

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 110
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 9
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

The Problem of Paradox in Analytic Christology : Some After-Dinner Reflections
Coakley, Sarah Anne. (2024). The Problem of Paradox in Analytic Christology : Some After-Dinner Reflections. In Paradox and Contradiction in Theology pp. 9-16 Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003319221-2
Response to Denys Turner
Coakley, Sarah. (2020). Response to Denys Turner. Modern Theology. 36(1), pp. 155-158. https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12572
Concluding eirenic (and mostly “unscientific”) postscript
Coakley, Sarah. (2019). Concluding eirenic (and mostly “unscientific”) postscript. Religion, Brain and Behavior. 9(4), pp. 423-434. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2019.1604419
Response to my critics in the journal of pentecostal theology
Coakley, Sarah. (2017). Response to my critics in the journal of pentecostal theology. Journal of Pentecostal Theology. 26(1), pp. 23-29. https://doi.org/10.1163/17455251-02601004
Person of Christ
Coakley, Sarah Anne. (2016). Person of Christ. In The Cambridge Companion to the Summa Theologiae pp. 222-239 Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139034159.018
Divine hiddenness or dark intimacy? How John of the Cross dissolves a contemporary philosophical dilemma
Coakley, Sarah Anne. (2016). Divine hiddenness or dark intimacy? How John of the Cross dissolves a contemporary philosophical dilemma. In Hidden Divinity and Religious Belief: New Perspectives pp. 229-245 Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139939621.014
Religious motivations for cooperation : An experimental investigation using explicit primes
Rand, David G., Dreber, Anna, Haque, Omar S., Kane, Rob J., Nowak, Martin A. and Coakley, Sarah. (2014). Religious motivations for cooperation : An experimental investigation using explicit primes. Religion, Brain and Behavior. 4(1), pp. 31-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2013.775664