The Problem of Paradox in Analytic Christology : Some After-Dinner Reflections

Book chapter


Coakley, Sarah Anne. (2024). The Problem of Paradox in Analytic Christology : Some After-Dinner Reflections. In Paradox and Contradiction in Theology pp. 9-16 Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003319221-2
AuthorsCoakley, Sarah Anne
Abstract

The following after-dinner speech was delivered by Sarah Coakley at the Logos Conference, which was held at the University of St Andrews on June 3, 2017. The problem was that the serious matter of the “hypostatic union” did not seem to me to lend itself obviously to the limerick, or the clerihew, or other standard gimmick traditionally useful for this slot; and moreover, it gradually became obvious that actually Alan wanted a bit more from me, anyway. The immediate popular riposte volume to The Myth of God Incarnate, entitled The Truth of God Incarnate, contributed more heat than light to the debate and presented a jumble of conservative responses which by no means consistently nailed the underlying philosophical problems. The attempted erasure—or at least easing—of paradox, on the assumption that it is simply a false baptism of incoherence, has been a striking feature of analytic philosophy of religion's approach to Christology in recent decades.

KeywordsPhilosophy; Theology; Religion; Christianity
Page range9-16
Year01 Jan 2024
Book titleParadox and Contradiction in Theology
PublisherRoutledge
Place of publicationUnited Kingdom
ISBN9781032321097
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003319221-2
Web address (URL)https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003319221-2/problem-paradox-analytic-christology-sarah-coakley
Open accessPublished as non-open access
Research or scholarlyResearch
Publisher's version
License
All rights reserved
File Access Level
Controlled
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Online29 Sep 2023
Publication process dates
Accepted2023
Deposited25 Jun 2024
Additional information

Copyright © 2023. Taylor & Francis Group. All rights reserved.

Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/90q71/the-problem-of-paradox-in-analytic-christology-some-after-dinner-reflections

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 2
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 2
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

Beyond understanding
Coakley, Sarah. (2021). Beyond understanding. Political Theology. 22(5), pp. 398-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/1462317X.2021.1955575
Response to Denys Turner
Coakley, Sarah. (2020). Response to Denys Turner. Modern Theology. 36(1), pp. 155-158. https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12572
Concluding eirenic (and mostly “unscientific”) postscript
Coakley, Sarah. (2019). Concluding eirenic (and mostly “unscientific”) postscript. Religion, Brain and Behavior. 9(4), pp. 423-434. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2019.1604419
Response to my critics in the journal of pentecostal theology
Coakley, Sarah. (2017). Response to my critics in the journal of pentecostal theology. Journal of Pentecostal Theology. 26(1), pp. 23-29. https://doi.org/10.1163/17455251-02601004
Person of Christ
Coakley, Sarah Anne. (2016). Person of Christ. In The Cambridge Companion to the Summa Theologiae pp. 222-239 Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139034159.018
Divine hiddenness or dark intimacy? How John of the Cross dissolves a contemporary philosophical dilemma
Coakley, Sarah Anne. (2016). Divine hiddenness or dark intimacy? How John of the Cross dissolves a contemporary philosophical dilemma. In Hidden Divinity and Religious Belief: New Perspectives pp. 229-245 Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139939621.014
Religious motivations for cooperation : An experimental investigation using explicit primes
Rand, David G., Dreber, Anna, Haque, Omar S., Kane, Rob J., Nowak, Martin A. and Coakley, Sarah. (2014). Religious motivations for cooperation : An experimental investigation using explicit primes. Religion, Brain and Behavior. 4(1), pp. 31-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2013.775664