Venous thromboembolism management practices and knowledge of guidelines: A survey of Australian haematologists and respiratory physicians

Background: Current international clinical practice guidelines do not adequately address all clinical scenarios in the management of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and no comprehensive Australian guidelines exist. Aims: To identify areas of uncertainty in VTE management and whether self‐reported practice is consistent with guidelines. Methods: We conducted an Australian cross‐sectional online survey consisting of 53 questions to investigate doctors’ VTE management practices. The survey was distributed to consultant and trainee/registrar haematologists and respiratory physicians with the aid of participating medical societies. Results: A total of 71 haematologists and 110 respiratory physicians responded to the survey. The majority of survey respondents were 31–50‐years old and worked in teaching hospitals and in the acute care setting. Under‐treatment was reported for high‐risk pulmonary embolism (PE) and duration of anticoagulation for first‐episode unprovoked PE (32 and 83% respectively). Over‐treatment was reported in areas of thrombolysis for intermediate‐risk PE (16%) and duration of anticoagulation for first‐episode provoked PE (41%). Uncertainty and variations in doctors’ management approaches were also found. Conclusion: This survey demonstrated significant over‐treatment, under‐treatment and variability in the practice of VTE management. The findings highlight the need for the development and implementation of national guidelines for the management of VTE in Australia.