Belief, faith, and acceptance

Journal article


Audi, Robert. (2008) Belief, faith, and acceptance. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion. 63(1-3), pp. 87 - 102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-007-9137-6
AuthorsAudi, Robert
Abstract

Belief is a central focus of inquiry in the philosophy of religion and indeed in the field of religion itself. No one conception of belief is central in all these cases, and sometimes the term ‘belief’ is used where ‘faith’ or ‘acceptance’ would better express what is intended. This paper sketches the major concepts in the philosophy of religion that are expressed by these three terms. In doing so, it distinguishes propositional belief (belief that) from both objectual belief (believing something to have a property) and, more importantly, belief in (a trusting attitude that is illustrated by at least many paradigm cases of belief in God). Faith is shown to have a similar complexity, and even propositional faith divides into importantly different categories. Acceptance differs from both belief and faith in that at least one kind of acceptance is behavioral in a way neither of the other two elements is. Acceptance of a proposition, it is argued, does not entail believing it, nor does believing entail acceptance in any distinctive sense of the latter term. In characterizing these three notions (and related ones), the paper provides some basic materials important both for understanding a person’s religious position and for appraising its rationality. The nature of religious faith and some of the conditions for its rationality, including some deriving from elements of an ethics of belief, are explored in some detail.

KeywordsAcceptance; Belief; Ethics of belief; Conviction; Defeasibility; Evidence; Faith; Hope; Justification; Probability; Rationality
Year2008
JournalInternational Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Journal citation63 (1-3), pp. 87 - 102
PublisherSpringer Netherlands
ISSN0020-7047
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-007-9137-6
Scopus EID2-s2.0-38349126743
Page range87 - 102
Place of publicationNetherlands
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8q23w/belief-faith-and-acceptance

  • 10
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

Doxasticism: Belief and the information-responsiveness of mind
Audi, Robert. (2019) Doxasticism: Belief and the information-responsiveness of mind. Episteme. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2018.53
Faith, belief, and will: Toward a volitional stance theory of faith
Audi, Robert. (2019) Faith, belief, and will: Toward a volitional stance theory of faith. Sophia: international journal of philosophy and traditions. 58(3), pp. 409 - 422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-018-0653-x
Methodological reflections on Kant’s ethical theory
Audi, Robert. (2018) Methodological reflections on Kant’s ethical theory. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-01977-x
Understanding, self-evidence, and justification
Audi, Robert. (2018) Understanding, self-evidence, and justification. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 99(2), pp. 358 - 381. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12492
Role modeling and reasons: Developmental and normative grounds of moral virtues
Audi, Robert. (2017) Role modeling and reasons: Developmental and normative grounds of moral virtues. Journal of Moral Philosophy. 14(6), pp. 646 - 668. https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-46810063
Trust, but verify: A language and the role of trust in corporate culture
Audi, Robert, Loughran, Tim and McDonald, Bill. (2016) Trust, but verify: A language and the role of trust in corporate culture. Journal of Business Ethics. 139(3), pp. 551 - 561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2659-4
Normative disagreement as a challenge to moral philosophy and philosophical theology
Audi, Robert. (2014) Normative disagreement as a challenge to moral philosophy and philosophical theology. In In M. Bergmann and P. Kain (Ed.). Challenges to moral and religious belief: Disagreement and evolution pp. 61 - 79 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669776.003.0004
Normativity and generality in ethics and aesthetics
Audi, Robert. (2014) Normativity and generality in ethics and aesthetics. Journal of Ethics. 18(4), pp. 373 - 390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-014-9185-y
Faith as attitude, trait, and virtue
Audi, Robert. (2014) Faith as attitude, trait, and virtue. In In K. Timpe and C. Boyd (Ed.). Virtues and their vices pp. 327 - 348 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199645541.003.0016
Normality and generality in ethics and aesthetics
Audi, Robert. (2014) Normality and generality in ethics and aesthetics. The Journal of Ethics: An International Philosophical Review. 18(4), pp. 373 - 390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-014-9185-y
Intuition, agency detection, and social coordination as analytical and explanatory constructs in the cognitive science of religion
Audi, Robert. (2014) Intuition, agency detection, and social coordination as analytical and explanatory constructs in the cognitive science of religion. In In R. Trigg and J. L. Barratt (Ed.). The roots of religion: Exploring the cognitive science of religion pp. 17 - 36 Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Church-State separation healthcare policy and religious liberty
Audi, Robert. (2014) Church-State separation healthcare policy and religious liberty. Journal of Practical Ethics. 2(1), pp. 1 - 23.
Ethical naturalism as a challenge to theological ethics
Audi, Robert. (2014) Ethical naturalism as a challenge to theological ethics. Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics. 34(1), pp. 21 - 39. https://doi.org/10.1353/sce.2014.0005
The scientific study of religion and the pillars of human dignity
Audi, Robert. (2013) The scientific study of religion and the pillars of human dignity. The Monist- An International Journal of General Philosophical Inquiry. 96(3), pp. 462 - 479.
Doxastic innocence: phenomenal conservatism and epistemological common sense
Audi, Robert. (2013) Doxastic innocence: phenomenal conservatism and epistemological common sense. In In C. Tucker (Ed.). Seemings and justification: new essays on dogmatism and phenomenal conservatism pp. 181 - 201 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199899494.003.0008
Knowledge, justification, and the normativity of epistemology
Audi, Robert. (2013) Knowledge, justification, and the normativity of epistemology. Modern Schoolman. 90(2), pp. 127 - 145. https://doi.org/10.11612/resphil.2013.90.2.2
Belief: A study of form, content, and reference
Audi, Robert. (2013) Belief: A study of form, content, and reference. In In N. Nottelmann (Ed.). New essays on belief: Constitution, content, and structure pp. 30 - 54 Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137026521_3
Doxastic Innocence: Phenomenal Conservatism and Epistemological Common Sense
Audi, Robert. (2013) Doxastic Innocence: Phenomenal Conservatism and Epistemological Common Sense. In In C. Tucker (Ed.). Seemings and Justification: New essays on dogmatism and phenomenal conservatis pp. 181 - 201 Oxford University Press.
Testimony as a social foundation of knowledge
Audi, Robert. (2013) Testimony as a social foundation of knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 87(3), pp. 507 - 531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00525.x
The practical authority of normative beliefs: Toward an integrated theory of practical rationality
Audi, Robert. (2013) The practical authority of normative beliefs: Toward an integrated theory of practical rationality. Organon F. 20(4), pp. 527 - 545.
The nature of normativity and the project of naturalizing the normative
Audi, Robert. (2013) The nature of normativity and the project of naturalizing the normative. In In J. Stelmach, B. Brozek and M. Hohol (Ed.). The many faces of normativity pp. 15 - 50 Copernicus Center Press.
Cognitive Disparities: Dimensions of Intellectual Diversity and the Resolution of Disagreements
Audi, Robert. (2013) Cognitive Disparities: Dimensions of Intellectual Diversity and the Resolution of Disagreements. In In D. Christensen and J. Lackey (Ed.). The Epistemology of Disagreement: New Essays pp. 205 - 222 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199698370.003.0010
Moral perception
Audi, Robert. (2013) Moral perception Princeton University Press.
Virtues, Concepts, and Rules in Business Ethics : Reflections on the Contributions of Robert C. Solomon
Audi, Robert. (2012) Virtues, Concepts, and Rules in Business Ethics : Reflections on the Contributions of Robert C. Solomon. In In K. Higgins and D. Sherman (Ed.). Passion, Death, and Spirituality pp. 103 - 111 Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4650-3_8
Are there two free will problems? Compatibilism, incompatibilism, and moral responsibility [Esistono due problemi del libero arbitrio? Compatibilismo, incompaibilismo e responsabilità morale]
Audi, Robert. (2012) Are there two free will problems? Compatibilism, incompatibilism, and moral responsibility [Esistono due problemi del libero arbitrio? Compatibilismo, incompaibilismo e responsabilità morale]. Rivista di Filosofia. 113(2), pp. 329 - 334.
Virtue ethics as a resource in business
Audi, Robert. (2012) Virtue ethics as a resource in business. Business Ethics Quarterly. 22(2), pp. 273 - 291. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201222220
Normativity be naturalized?
Audi, Robert. (2012) Normativity be naturalized? In In S. Nuccetelli and G. Seay (Ed.). Ethical Naturalism: Current Debates pp. 169 - 193 Cambridge University Press.
Religion and politics
Audi, Robert. (2012) Religion and politics. In In D. Estlund (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy pp. 223 - 240 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376692.013.0012
Secular and religious foundations of normative standards: Liberalism, naturalism, and rationalism in political philosophy
Audi, Robert. (2012) Secular and religious foundations of normative standards: Liberalism, naturalism, and rationalism in political philosophy. In In L. Siep, T. Gutmann and B. Jakl (Ed.). From the religious to the secular justification of state standards pp. 33 - 55 Mohr Siebeck.
Natural reason, religious conviction, and the justification of coercion in democratic societies
Audi, Robert. (2012) Natural reason, religious conviction, and the justification of coercion in democratic societies. In In L. Zucca and C. Ungureanu (Ed.). Law, State and Religion in the New Europe: Debates and Dilemmas pp. 65 - 92 Cambridge University Press.
Kantian intuitionism as a framework for the justification of moral judgements
Audi, Robert. (2012) Kantian intuitionism as a framework for the justification of moral judgements. In In M. Timmons (Ed.). Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics 2 pp. 8 - 31 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199662951.003.0006
Reason and experience, obligation and value: An introduction to the New Intuitionism
Audi, Robert. (2011) Reason and experience, obligation and value: An introduction to the New Intuitionism. In In J. Graper Hernandez (Ed.). The New Intuitionism pp. 45 - 52 Continuum International Publishing Group.
Democratic authority and the separation of church and state
Audi, Robert. (2011) Democratic authority and the separation of church and state Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199796083.001.0001
Rationality and religious commitment
Audi, Robert. (2011) Rationality and religious commitment Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199609574.001.0001
The ethics of belief and the morality of action: Intellectual responsibility and rational disagreement
Audi, Robert. (2011) The ethics of belief and the morality of action: Intellectual responsibility and rational disagreement. Philosophy. 86(1), pp. 5 - 29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819110000586
Faith, faithfulness, and virtue
Audi, Robert. (2011) Faith, faithfulness, and virtue. Faith and Philosophy. 28(3), pp. 294 - 309.
Moral knowledge
Audi, Robert. (2011) Moral knowledge. In In S. Bernecker and D. Pritchard (Ed.). The Routledge Companion to Epistemology pp. 380 - 392 Routledge.
Intuitions, intuitionism, and moral judgment
Audi, Robert. (2011) Intuitions, intuitionism, and moral judgment. In In J. G. Hernandez (Ed.). The New Intuitionism, London and New York pp. 171 - 198 Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd.
Recent work in ethical theory and its implications for business ethics
Arnold, Denis, Audi, Robert and Zwolinski, Matt. (2010) Recent work in ethical theory and its implications for business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly. 20(4), pp. 559 - 581. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201020438
The place of ethical theory in business ethics
Audi, Robert. (2010) The place of ethical theory in business ethics. In In G. G. Brenkert (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Business Ethics pp. 46 - 69 Oxford University Press.
Virtue Ethics in Theory and Practice
Audi, Robert. (2010) Virtue Ethics in Theory and Practice. In In N. Szutta (Ed.). Wspolczesna Etyka Cnot: Mozliwosci I Orgraniczenisa pp. 39 - 66 Semper.
Reasons for action
Audi, Robert. (2010) Reasons for action. In In J. Skorupski (Ed.). The Routledge Companion to Ethics pp. 275 - 285 Routledge.
Moral perception and moral knowledge
Audi, Robert. (2010) Moral perception and moral knowledge. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume. 84(1), pp. 79 - 97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8349.2010.00187.x
Practical reason and the status of moral obligation
Audi, Robert. (2010) Practical reason and the status of moral obligation. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 33(Sup1), pp. 197 - 229. https://doi.org/10.1353/cjp.0.0074
Corporate culture and quality of life: The virtues of industry and the rewards of leisure
Audi, Robert. (2010) Corporate culture and quality of life: The virtues of industry and the rewards of leisure. In In M. R. Haney and A. D. Kline (Ed.). The Value of Time and Leisure in a World of Work pp. 89 - 100 Lexington Books.
Moral virtue and reasons for action
Audi, Robert. (2009) Moral virtue and reasons for action. Philosophical issues. 19, pp. 1 - 20.
Religious reasons and the liberty of citizens: Reflections on Kent Greenawalt's 'religion and the constitution'
Audi, Robert. (2009) Religious reasons and the liberty of citizens: Reflections on Kent Greenawalt's 'religion and the constitution'. Constitutional Commentary.
Science education, religious toleration, and liberal neutrality toward the good
Audi, Robert. (2009) Science education, religious toleration, and liberal neutrality toward the good. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Education pp. 333 - 357 Oxford University Press.
Natural reason, natural rights, and governmental neutrality toward religion
Audi, Robert. (2009) Natural reason, natural rights, and governmental neutrality toward religion. Religion and Human Rights. 4(2-3), pp. 157 - 175. https://doi.org/10.1163/187103109X12471223630955
Business ethics and ethical business
Audi, Robert. (2009) Business ethics and ethical business Oxford University Press.
Objectivity without egoism: Toward balance in business ethics
Audi, Robert. (2009) Objectivity without egoism: Toward balance in business ethics. Academy of Management Learning and Education. 8(2), pp. 263 - 274. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2009.41788850
Nationalism, patriotism, and cosmopolitanism in an age of globalization
Audi, Robert. (2009) Nationalism, patriotism, and cosmopolitanism in an age of globalization. Journal of Ethics. 13(4), pp. 365 - 381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-009-9068-9
The psychology of character and the theology of virtue
Audi, Robert. (2009) The psychology of character and the theology of virtue. In In C. S. Titus (Ed.). The Psychology of Character and Virtue pp. 101 - 118 The Institute for the Psychological Sciences.
Religion and the politics of science: Can evolutionary biology be religiously neutral?
Audi, Robert. (2009) Religion and the politics of science: Can evolutionary biology be religiously neutral? Philosophy and Social Criticism. 35(1-2), pp. 23 - 50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453708098753
Reliability as a virtue
Audi, Robert. (2009) Reliability as a virtue. Philosophical Studies. 142, pp. 43 - 54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-008-9305-2
The marketing of human images as a challenge to ethical leadership
Audi, Robert. (2008) The marketing of human images as a challenge to ethical leadership. In In G. Flynn (Ed.). Leadership and Business Ethics pp. 197 - 209 Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8429-4_13
Some dimensions of trust in business practices: From financial and product representation to licensure and voting
Audi, Robert. (2008) Some dimensions of trust in business practices: From financial and product representation to licensure and voting. Journal of Business Ethics. 80(1), pp. 97 - 102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9435-z
Skepticism about the a priori justification: Self-evidence, defeasibiity, and cogito propositions
Audi, Robert. (2008) Skepticism about the a priori justification: Self-evidence, defeasibiity, and cogito propositions. In In J. Greco (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism pp. 149 - 175 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195183214.003.0008
The ethics of belief: Doxastic self-control and intellectual virtue
Audi, Robert. (2008) The ethics of belief: Doxastic self-control and intellectual virtue. Synthese. 161, pp. 403 - 418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403251335
Rational disagreement as a challenge to practical ethics and moral theory: An essay in moral epistemology
Audi, Robert. (2008) Rational disagreement as a challenge to practical ethics and moral theory: An essay in moral epistemology. In In Q. Smith (Ed.). Epistemology: New Essays pp. 225 - 247 Oxford Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199264933.003.0010
Intuition, inference, and rational disagreement in ethics
Audi, Robert. (2008) Intuition, inference, and rational disagreement in ethics. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 11(5), pp. 475 - 492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-008-9123-9
The good in the right: A theory of intuition and intrinsic value
Audi, Robert. (2004) The good in the right: A theory of intuition and intrinsic value Princeton University Press.