The present and the future of the Research Excellence Framework impact agenda in the UK Academy: A reflection from politics and international studies

Journal article


Mhurchú, Aoileann Ní, McLeod, Laura, Collins, Stephanie and Siles-Brügge, Gabriel 2017. The present and the future of the Research Excellence Framework impact agenda in the UK Academy: A reflection from politics and international studies. Political Studies Review. 15 (1), pp. 60 - 72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929916658918
AuthorsMhurchú, Aoileann Ní, McLeod, Laura, Collins, Stephanie and Siles-Brügge, Gabriel
Abstract

One of the most extensively discussed requirements introduced in the 2014 Research Excellence Framework was impact. In this review piece, we focus on the linear and temporal consequences of the Research Excellence Framework (REF) impact system. We link such consequences to our own research agendas to provide a sense of empirical richness to the broad concerns that arise from the impact agenda and to highlight the effects of the Research Excellence Framework’s linear focus and, crucially, the types of alternative narratives it potentially silences. This ‘silencing’ does not render alternative narratives impossible, but rather makes them difficult to articulate as ‘safe’ options within the existing framework. We highlight how a focus on direct impact could miss the collective nature of impact endeavours, as well as the broader social and cultural benefits of research, and potentially shape and limit the possible research questions posed within this national system. We conclude by opening up some broader questions for the future of impact raised through the consideration of linearity, including the question of ‘measurement’.

KeywordsResearch Excellence Framework; impact agenda; linearity; direct impact; critical inquiry
Year2017
JournalPolitical Studies Review
Journal citation15 (1), pp. 60 - 72
PublisherSage
ISSN1478-9299
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929916658918
Scopus EID2-s2.0-85011845617
Page range60 - 72
Research GroupInstitute for Religion and Critical Inquiry
Place of publicationUnited Kingdom
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/89v8v/the-present-and-the-future-of-the-research-excellence-framework-impact-agenda-in-the-uk-academy-a-reflection-from-politics-and-international-studies

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 0
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Collective Responsibility Gaps
Collins, Stephanie 2019. Collective Responsibility Gaps. Journal of Business Ethics. 154 (4), pp. 943 - 954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3890-6
When does ‘Can’ imply ‘Ought’?
Collins, Stephanie 2018. When does ‘Can’ imply ‘Ought’? International Journal of Philosophical Studies. 26 (3), pp. 354 - 375. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2018.1489643
‘The Government should be ashamed’: On the possibility of organisations’ emotional duties
Collins, Stephanie 2018. ‘The Government should be ashamed’: On the possibility of organisations’ emotional duties. Political Studies. 66 (4), pp. 813 - 829. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321717739553
Filling collective duty gaps
Collins, Stephanie 2017. Filling collective duty gaps. Journal of Philosophy. 114 (11), pp. 573 - 591. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil20171141141
Responsibility for states' actions: Normative issues at the intersection of collective agency and state responsibility
Lawford-Smith, Holly and Collins, Stephanie 2017. Responsibility for states' actions: Normative issues at the intersection of collective agency and state responsibility. Philosophy Compass. 12 (11), pp. 1 - 8. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12456
The claims and duties of socioeconomic human rights
Collins, Stephanie 2016. The claims and duties of socioeconomic human rights. The Philosophical Quarterly. 66 (265), pp. 701 - 722. https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqw010
The transfer of duties: From individuals to states and back again
Collins, Stephanie and Lawford-Smith, Holly 2016. The transfer of duties: From individuals to states and back again. in: M. Brady and M. Fricker (ed.) The epistemic life of groups: Essays in the epistemology of collectives United States of America: Oxford University Press. pp. 150 - 172
Collectives' and individuals' obligations: A parity argument
Collins, Stephanie and Lawford-Smith, Holly 2016. Collectives' and individuals' obligations: A parity argument. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 46 (1), pp. 38 - 58. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2015.1116350
Distributing states' duties
Collins, Stephanie 2016. Distributing states' duties. Journal of Political Philosophy. 24 (3), pp. 344 - 366. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12069