How explanation guides confirmation

Journal article


Climenhaga, Nevin 2017. How explanation guides confirmation. Philosophy of Science: official journal of the Philosophy of Science Association. 84 (2), pp. 359 - 368. https://doi.org/10.1086/690723
AuthorsClimenhaga, Nevin
Abstract

Where E is the proposition that [If H and O were true, H would explain O], William Roche and Elliot Sober have argued that P(H | O&E) = P(H | O). In this article I argue that not only is this equality not generally true, it is false in the very kinds of cases that Roche and Sober focus on, involving frequency data. In fact, in such cases O raises the probability of H only given that there is an explanatory connection between them.

Year2017
JournalPhilosophy of Science: official journal of the Philosophy of Science Association
Journal citation84 (2), pp. 359 - 368
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press
ISSN0031-8248
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1086/690723
Scopus EID2-s2.0-85015221728
Page range359 - 368
Research GroupDianoia Institute of Philosophy
Place of publicationUnited States of America
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/89z72/how-explanation-guides-confirmation

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 0
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Infinite value and the best of all possible worlds
Climenhaga, Nevin 2018. Infinite value and the best of all possible worlds. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 97 (2), pp. 367 - 392. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12383
Intuitions are used as evidence in philosophy
Climenhaga, Nevin 2018. Intuitions are used as evidence in philosophy. Mind: A Quarterly review of philosophy. 127 (505), pp. 69 - 104. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzw032
Inference to the best explanation made incoherent
Climenhaga, Nevin 2017. Inference to the best explanation made incoherent. Journal of Philosophy. 114 (5), pp. 251 - 273. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2017114519