Reassessment intervals for transition from low to high fracture risk among adults older than 50 years
Leslie, William D., Morin, Suzanne N., Lix, Lisa M., Martineau, Patrick, Bryanton, Mark, McCloskey, Eugene V., Johansson, Helena, Harvey, Nicholas C. and Kanis, John A.. (2020). Reassessment intervals for transition from low to high fracture risk among adults older than 50 years. JAMA Network Open. 3(1), pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18954
|Authors||Leslie, William D., Morin, Suzanne N., Lix, Lisa M., Martineau, Patrick, Bryanton, Mark, McCloskey, Eugene V., Johansson, Helena, Harvey, Nicholas C. and Kanis, John A.|
Importance: Fracture risk scores are used to identify individuals at high risk of major osteoporotic fracture or hip fracture for antiosteoporosis treatment. For those not meeting treatment thresholds at baseline, the optimal interval for reassessing fracture risk is uncertain.
Objective: To examine reassessment intervals for transition from low to high fracture risk under guidelines-defined treatment thresholds.
Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included persons aged 50 years or older with fracture risk below treatment thresholds at baseline who had fracture risk reassessed at least 1 year later. Data were obtained from a population-based bone mineral density registry (baseline assessment during 1996-2015; reassessment to 2016) in the Province of Manitoba, Canada. Primary analysis was performed from May to June 2019. Analysis for the revision was performed in October 2019.
Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was time to transition from low (below the treatment threshold) to high fracture risk (treatment-qualifying risk score using osteoporosis clinical practice guidelines strategies for Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom).
Results: The study population consisted of 10 564 individuals (94.1% women; mean [SD] age at baseline, 63.2 [8.2] years). At the time of reassessment (a mean [SD] interval of 5.2 [2.9] years between initial and subsequent fracture risk assessment), 690 (6.6%) had reached the fixed major osteoporotic fracture treatment threshold of 20%, 1546 (16.2%) had reached the fixed hip treatment threshold of 3%, and 932 (9.4%) had reached the age-dependent major osteoporotic fracture treatment threshold. Among those below 25% of the treatment threshold at baseline for each guideline, few (0%-3.0%) reached guidelines-defined high fracture risk at follow-up. In contrast, among those at the upper end of the scale for each guideline (75%-99% of the treatment threshold at baseline), 30.6% to 74.4% reached guidelines-defined high fracture risk. An increased number of clinical risk factors was associated with increased likelihood of reaching guidelines-defined high fracture risk (range for 3 guidelines, 17.1%-28.2%) compared with unchanged or decreased clinical risk factors (range for 3 guidelines, 3.3%-12.8%) (P < .001). Estimated time for 10% of the population to reach treatment-qualifying high fracture risk ranged from fewer than 3 years to more than 15 years.
Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that baseline fracture risk (as a fraction of the treatment threshold) and change in clinical risk factors can identify individuals with low and high probability of guidelines-defined high fracture risk during follow-up, thereby potentially helping to inform the reassessment interval.
|Journal||JAMA Network Open|
|Journal citation||3 (1), pp. 1-12|
|Publisher||American Medical Association|
|Digital Object Identifier (DOI)||https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18954|
|Open access||Published as ‘gold’ (paid) open access|
|Research or scholarly||Research|
File Access Level
|Online||10 Jan 2020|
|Publication process dates|
|Accepted||04 Nov 2019|
|Deposited||06 May 2021|
2views this month
0downloads this month