Reasonable accommodation of employees’ parenting and care responsibilities : A human rights perspective

Journal article


Swannie, Bill. (2022). Reasonable accommodation of employees’ parenting and care responsibilities : A human rights perspective. Monash University Law Review. 48(2), pp. 208-237.
AuthorsSwannie, Bill
Abstract

Positive duties, including a duty to accommodate, are rare in Australian anti-discrimination law. In 2008, the Victorian Parliament enacted a duty on employers to accommodate employees' parenting or carer responsibilities. This unique duty requires employers to seriously consider how they can accommodate such responsibilities when they determine work arrangements. So far, however, these provisions have been interpreted as requiring all employees to be treated the same, regardless of their circumstances. This article argues that interpretation of the provisions should be guided by the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic). A human rights-focused interpretation would give more weight to the interests of employees with parenting or carer responsibilities and would support the legislative purpose of promoting their full and equal participation in the workforce. This would also assist the cultural change needed to challenge gendered stereotypes regarding the respective roles of men and women in relation to employment and carer work.

Year2022
JournalMonash University Law Review
Journal citation48 (2), pp. 208-237
PublisherFaculty of Law, Monash University
ISSN0311-3140
Web address (URL)https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=a9h&AN=163305418&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s5501413
Page range208-237
Publisher's version
License
All rights reserved
File Access Level
Controlled
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Online2022
Publication process dates
Deposited29 May 2023
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8z11y/reasonable-accommodation-of-employees-parenting-and-care-responsibilities-a-human-rights-perspective

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 29
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 2
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

Examining BA v The King : Can a ‘home’ provide security from domestic violence?
Swannie, William. (2024). Examining BA v The King : Can a ‘home’ provide security from domestic violence? Alternative Law Journal. 49(2), pp. 120-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X241237015
A critical appraisal of the 'no contact' rule
Swannie, Bill. (2023). A critical appraisal of the 'no contact' rule. Adelaide Law Review. 44(1), pp. 246-273.
Protection from forced eviction : What rights do social housing tenants have under human rights charters?
Swannie, Bill. (2023). Protection from forced eviction : What rights do social housing tenants have under human rights charters? Australian Journal of Human Rights. 29(1), pp. 23-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/1323238x.2023.2226948
Protection from institutional censorship : An essential aspect of academic freedom
Swannie, Bill. (2022). Protection from institutional censorship : An essential aspect of academic freedom. University of New South Wales Law Journal. 45(4), pp. 1489-1512. https://doi.org/10.53637/DHIC5747
A critical appraisal of the media safe harbour in the Australian Consumer Law
Swannie, Bill. (2022). A critical appraisal of the media safe harbour in the Australian Consumer Law. Australian Business Law Review. 50(2), pp. 126-143.
Rights, Liberties and Restrictions
Swannie, William. (2021). Rights, Liberties and Restrictions. In Australian Constitutional Law and Government pp. 325-348 LexisNexis.
Corrective justice and redress under Australia's racial vilification laws
Swannie, Bill. (2021). Corrective justice and redress under Australia's racial vilification laws. University of Queensland Law Journal. 40(1), pp. 27-66.
Speaking back : Does counterspeech provide adequate redress for racial vilification?
Swannie, Bill. (2021). Speaking back : Does counterspeech provide adequate redress for racial vilification? Adelaide Law Review. 42(1), pp. 39-72.
Protecting victims not punishing perpetrators : Clarifying the purpose of s 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act
Swannie, Bill. (2020). Protecting victims not punishing perpetrators : Clarifying the purpose of s 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act. Media and Arts Law Review. 24(1), pp. 24-47.
Speech acts : Is racial vilification a form of racial discrimination?
Swannie, William. (2020). Speech acts : Is racial vilification a form of racial discrimination? Adelaide Law Review. 41(1), pp. 179-216.
Racially derogatory cartoons and racial vilification laws : Where to draw the line?
Swannie, Bill. (2020). Racially derogatory cartoons and racial vilification laws : Where to draw the line? Alternative Law Journal. 45(4), pp. 291-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X20918663
The influence of defamation law on the interpretation of Australia’s racial vilification laws
Swannie, Bill. (2020). The influence of defamation law on the interpretation of Australia’s racial vilification laws. Torts Law Journal. 26(1), pp. 34-72.
From Alienation to Empowerment : How Legal Educators Can Support Student Wellbeing
Swannie, William. (2019). From Alienation to Empowerment : How Legal Educators Can Support Student Wellbeing. In Wellness for Law: Making Wellness Core Business pp. 123-129 Lexis Nexis Australia.
Are racial vilification laws supported by free speech arguments?
Swannie, Bill. (2019). Are racial vilification laws supported by free speech arguments? Monash University Law Review. 44(1), pp. 71-111. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3382027
Airbnb and residential tenancy law : Do ‘home sharing’ arrangements constitute a licence or a lease?
Swannie, Bill. (2018). Airbnb and residential tenancy law : Do ‘home sharing’ arrangements constitute a licence or a lease? Adelaide Law Review. 39(2), pp. 231-247.