Reliability and validity of the IPAQ-L in a sample of Hong Kong Urban older adults: Does neighborhood of residence matter?
Cerin, Ester, Barnett, Anthony, Cheung, Man-chin, Sit, Cindy, Macfarlane, Duncan J. and Chan, Wai-man. (2012). Reliability and validity of the IPAQ-L in a sample of Hong Kong Urban older adults: Does neighborhood of residence matter? Journal of Aging and Physical Activity. https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.20.4.402
|Authors||Cerin, Ester, Barnett, Anthony, Cheung, Man-chin, Sit, Cindy, Macfarlane, Duncan J. and Chan, Wai-man|
This study examined reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire–Long Form (IPAQ-LC) in Chinese seniors, including moderating effects of neighborhood walkability and socioeconomic status (SES) on reliability and validity. The IPAQ-LC was interviewer-administered (n = 96), accelerometer and 7-day walk-diary data were collected (n = 94), and the IPAC-LC was readministered (N = 92). Acceptable reliability was found for all measures of physical activity (PA) overall and across different types of neighborhood. Participants from highly walkable neighborhoods were more reliable at estimating walking for transport. Participants from low-SES areas were less reliable at estimating leisure-time PA and sitting but more reliable at estimating transport-related walking. IPAQ-LC walking was significantly related to light- but not moderate-intensity accelerometry-based PA. It was moderately to strongly related to a 7-day diary of walking. The data imply slow-paced walking, probably due to age, climate, and terrain. The findings suggest that the IPAQ-LC’s reliability and validity are acceptable in Chinese seniors.
|Keywords||physical activity; self-report measure; elders; walkability|
|Journal||Journal of Aging and Physical Activity|
|Digital Object Identifier (DOI)||https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.20.4.402|
|Research Group||Institute for Health and Ageing|
File Access Level
2views this month
0downloads this month