A user’s guide to hybrid tools
Journal article
Perl, Caleb. (2020). A user’s guide to hybrid tools. Mind: A Quarterly review of philosophy. 129(153), pp. 129-158. https://doi.org/10.1093/MIND/FZY063
Authors | Perl, Caleb |
---|---|
Abstract | Hybrid metaethical theories have significant promise; they would have important upshots if they were true. But they also face severe problems. The problems are severe enough to make many philosophers doubt that they could be true. My ambition is to show that the problems are just instances of a highly general problem: a problem about what are sometimes called ‘intensional anaphora'. I'll also show that any adequate explanation of intensional anaphora immediately solves all the problems for the hybrid theorist. We should regard hybrid tools as among the most legitimate tools in our toolkit—at least when we use them properly. |
Year | 2020 |
Journal | Mind: A Quarterly review of philosophy |
Journal citation | 129 (153), pp. 129-158 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
ISSN | 0026-4423 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1093/MIND/FZY063 |
Scopus EID | 2-s2.0-85088171045 |
Research or scholarly | Research |
Page range | 129-158 |
Publisher's version | License All rights reserved File Access Level Controlled |
Output status | Published |
Publication dates | |
Online | 24 Dec 2018 |
Publication process dates | |
Deposited | 24 Aug 2021 |
Permalink -
https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8wq29/a-user-s-guide-to-hybrid-tools
Restricted files
Publisher's version
(1 files)
74
total views0
total downloads0
views this month0
downloads this month