Green spaces and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies
Journal article
Rojas-Rueda, David, Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark J., Gascon, Mireia, Perez-Leon, Daniela and Mudu, Pierpaolo. (2019). Green spaces and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. The Lancet Planetary Health. 3(11), pp. 469 - 477. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30215-3
Authors | Rojas-Rueda, David, Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark J., Gascon, Mireia, Perez-Leon, Daniela and Mudu, Pierpaolo |
---|---|
Abstract | Background Green spaces have been proposed to be a health determinant, improving health and wellbeing through different mechanisms. We aimed to systematically review the epidemiological evidence from longitudinal studies that have investigated green spaces and their association with all-cause mortality. We aimed to evaluate this evidence with a meta-analysis, to determine exposure-response functions for future quantitative health impact assessments. Methods We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies on green spaces and all-cause mortality. We searched for studies published and indexed in MEDLINE before Aug 20, 2019, which we complemented with an additional search of cited literature. We included studies if their design was longitudinal; the exposure of interest was measured green space; the endpoint of interest was all-cause mortality; they provided a risk estimate (ie, a hazard ratio [HR]) and the corresponding 95% CI for the association between green space exposure and all-cause mortality; and they used normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) as their green space exposure definition. Two investigators (DR-R and DP-L) independently screened the full-text articles for inclusion. We used a random-effects model to obtain pooled HRs. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42018090315. Findings We identified 9298 studies in MEDLINE and 13 studies that were reported in the literature but not indexed in MEDLINE, of which 9234 (99%) studies were excluded after screening the titles and abstracts and 68 (88%) of 77 remaining studies were excluded after assessment of the full texts. We included nine (12%) studies in our quantitative evaluation, which comprised 8 324 652 individuals from seven countries. Seven (78%) of the nine studies found a significant inverse relationship between an increase in surrounding greenness per 0·1 NDVI in a buffer zone of 500 m or less and the risk of all-cause mortality, but two studies found no association. The pooled HR for all-cause mortality per increment of 0·1 NDVI within a buffer of 500 m or less of a participant's residence was 0·96 (95% CI 0·94–0·97; I2, 95%). Interpretation We found evidence of an inverse association between surrounding greenness and all-cause mortality. Interventions to increase and manage green spaces should therefore be considered as a strategic public health intervention. |
Year | 2019 |
Journal | The Lancet Planetary Health |
Journal citation | 3 (11), pp. 469 - 477 |
Publisher | The Lancet Publishing Group |
ISSN | 2542-5196 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30215-3 |
Scopus EID | 2-s2.0-85075161360 |
Open access | Open access |
Page range | 469 - 477 |
Research Group | Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research |
Publisher's version | License |
Place of publication | United Kingdom |
https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/874x7/green-spaces-and-mortality-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis-of-cohort-studies
Download files
Publisher's version
OA_Rojas_Rueda_2019_Green_spaces_and_mortality_a_systematic.pdf | |
License: CC BY 3.0 |
350
total views470
total downloads30
views this month9
downloads this month