Land use regression models for ultrafine particles in six European areas
Journal article
van Nunen, Erik, Vermeulen, Roel, Tsai, Ming-Yi, Probst-Hensch, Nicole, Ineichen, Alex, Davey, Mark, Imboden, Medea, Ducret-Stich, Regina, Naccarati, Alessio, Raffaele, Daniela, Ranzi, Andrea, Ivaldi, Cristiana, Galassi, Claudia, Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark, Curto, A., Donaire-Gonzalez, D., Cirach, Marta, Chatzi, Leda, Kampouri, Mariza, ... Gerard,. (2017). Land use regression models for ultrafine particles in six European areas. Environmental Science and Technology. 51(6), pp. 3336 - 3345. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05920
Authors | van Nunen, Erik, Vermeulen, Roel, Tsai, Ming-Yi, Probst-Hensch, Nicole, Ineichen, Alex, Davey, Mark, Imboden, Medea, Ducret-Stich, Regina, Naccarati, Alessio, Raffaele, Daniela, Ranzi, Andrea, Ivaldi, Cristiana, Galassi, Claudia, Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark, Curto, A., Donaire-Gonzalez, D., Cirach, Marta, Chatzi, Leda, Kampouri, Mariza, Vlaanderen, Jelle, Meliefste, Kees, Buijtenhuijs, Daan, Brunekreef, Bert, David, Utrecht University, Paolo,, John, and Gerard, |
---|---|
Abstract | Long-term ultrafine particle (UFP) exposure estimates at a fine spatial scale are needed for epidemiological studies. Land use regression (LUR) models were developed and evaluated for six European areas based on repeated 30 min monitoring following standardized protocols. In each area; Basel (Switzerland), Heraklion (Greece), Amsterdam, Maastricht, and Utrecht (“The Netherlands”), Norwich (United Kingdom), Sabadell (Spain), and Turin (Italy), 160–240 sites were monitored to develop LUR models by supervised stepwise selection of GIS predictors. For each area and all areas combined, 10 models were developed in stratified random selections of 90% of sites. UFP prediction robustness was evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) at 31–50 external sites per area. Models from Basel and The Netherlands were validated against repeated 24 h outdoor measurements. Structure and model R2 of local models were similar within, but varied between areas (e.g., 38–43% Turin; 25–31% Sabadell). Robustness of predictions within areas was high (ICC 0.73–0.98). External validation R2 was 53% in Basel and 50% in The Netherlands. Combined area models were robust (ICC 0.93–1.00) and explained UFP variation almost equally well as local models. In conclusion, robust UFP LUR models could be developed on short-term monitoring, explaining around 50% of spatial variance in longer-term measurements. |
Year | 2017 |
Journal | Environmental Science and Technology |
Journal citation | 51 (6), pp. 3336 - 3345 |
Publisher | American Chemical Society |
ISSN | 0013-936X |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05920 |
Scopus EID | 2-s2.0-85018433344 |
Open access | Open access |
Page range | 3336 - 3345 |
Research Group | Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research |
Publisher's version | License |
Place of publication | United States |
Editors | D. L. Sedlak and B. E. Logan |
https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8917q/land-use-regression-models-for-ultrafine-particles-in-six-european-areas
Download files
Publisher's version
OA_van_Nunen_2017_Land_use_regression_models_for_ultrafine.pdf | |
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 |
176
total views105
total downloads0
views this month0
downloads this month