A virtual community of practice for general practice training: A preimplementation survey
Barnett, Stephen, Jones, Sandra Carol, Bennett, Sue, Iverson, Don and Robinson, Laura. (2016). A virtual community of practice for general practice training: A preimplementation survey. JMIR Medical Education. 2(2), pp. 1 - 12. https://doi.org/10.2196/mededu.5318
|Authors||Barnett, Stephen, Jones, Sandra Carol, Bennett, Sue, Iverson, Don and Robinson, Laura|
Background: Professional isolation is an important factor in low rural health workforce retention. Objective: The aim of this study was to gain insights to inform the development of an implementation plan for a virtual community of practice (VCoP) for general practice (GP) training in regional Australia. The study also aimed to assess the applicability of the findings of an existing framework in developing this plan. This included ascertaining the main drivers of usage, or usefulness, of the VCoP for users and establishing the different priorities between user groups. Methods: A survey study, based on the seven-step health VCoP framework, was conducted with general practice supervisors and registrars—133 usable responses; 40% estimated response rate. Data was analyzed using the t test and the chi-square test for comparisons between groups. Factor analysis and generalized linear regression modeling were used to ascertain factors which may independently predict intention to use the VCoP. Results: In establishing a VCoP, facilitation was seen as important. Regarding stakeholders, the GP training provider was an important sponsor. Factor analysis showed a single goal of usefulness. Registrars had a higher intention to use the VCoP (P < .001) and to perceive it as useful (P < .001) than supervisors. Usefulness independently predicted intention to actively use the VCoP (P < .001). Regarding engagement of a broad church of users, registrars were more likely than supervisors to want allied health professional and specialist involvement (P < .001). A supportive environment was deemed important, but most important was the quality of the content. Participants wanted regular feedback about site activity. Regarding technology and community, training can be online, but trust is better built face-to-face. Supervisors were significantly more likely than registrars to perceive that registrars needed help with knowledge (P=.01) and implementation of knowledge (P < .001). Conclusions: Important factors for a GP training VCoP include the following: facilitation covering administration and expertise, the perceived usefulness of the community, focusing usefulness around knowledge sharing, and overcoming professional isolation with high-quality content. Knowledge needs of different users should be acknowledged and help can be provided online, but trust is better built face-to-face. In conclusion, the findings of the health framework for VCoPs are relevant when developing an implementation plan for a VCoP for GP training. The main driver of success for a GP training VCoP is the perception of its usefulness by participants. Overcoming professional isolation for GP registrars using a VCoP has implications for training and retention of health workers in rural areas.
|Keywords||medical informatics; e-learning; virtual communities of practice|
|Journal||JMIR Medical Education|
|Journal citation||2 (2), pp. 1 - 12|
|Digital Object Identifier (DOI)||https://doi.org/10.2196/mededu.5318|
|Open access||Open access|
|Page range||1 - 12|
|Research Group||Centre for Health and Social Research|
© Stephen Barnett, Sandra C Jones, Sue Bennett, Don Iverson, Laura Robinson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/).
|Place of publication||United States of America|
0views this month
1downloads this month