Smokescreens and beer goggles: How alcohol industry CSM protects the industry
Jones, Sandra C., Wyatt, Austin and Daube, Mike. (2016) Smokescreens and beer goggles: How alcohol industry CSM protects the industry. Social Marketing Quarterly. 22(4), pp. 264 - 279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500415621558
|Authors||Jones, Sandra C., Wyatt, Austin and Daube, Mike|
Corporate social marketing (CSM) is one of several initiatives companies can undertake to demonstrate their corporate social responsibility (CSR). While there are many motivations for CSR and CSM, all are linked to profit in some way, including promoting the reputation of the organization. While CSM is often seen as evidence of organizations making a contribution to their community, there are some industries whose CSM campaigns have drawn considerable controversy and criticism. This article discusses the role of the alcohol industry in developing and disseminating “responsible drinking” CSM activities. It discusses some of the problems identified with alcohol industry CSM campaigns—including evidence that industry education campaigns communicate ambiguous messages; improve public perceptions of the industry but do not discourage harmful or underage drinking; and divert attention from more effective approaches, such as controls on price and availability. The paper also addresses the issue of other CSM/CRM activities undertaken by the alcohol industry, such as encouraging consumers to purchase a brand by donating a proportion of the profits to health and social causes (including those that are exacerbated by alcohol consumption). It discusses the value of these activities for the industry and their potential negative impact on the health of the community. In summary, the evidence suggests that industry CSM and CRM activities protect the industry (from restrictive policies and declining sales) but may in fact be detrimental to the community.
|Keywords||corporate social marketing; cause-related marketing; alcohol industry; responsibility|
|Journal||Social Marketing Quarterly|
|Journal citation||22 (4), pp. 264 - 279|
|Digital Object Identifier (DOI)||https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500415621558|
|Open access||Open access|
|Page range||264 - 279|
|Research Group||Centre for Health and Social Research|
|Author's accepted manuscript|
This is an accepted manuscript.
21views this month
15downloads this month